[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PULSAR-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17314395#comment-17314395
]
Bowen Li commented on PULSAR-12:
Hello, I'm a master's student at Fudan University. I'm in
koshkarov commented on issue #122:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/122#issuecomment-812907867
This was the biggest reason why we decided not to use Apache Pulsar and
favored Apache Kafka, as our whole team uses Windows laptops as dev machines.
--
This is an aut
Hi Rui,
Thanks for the feedback. My understanding about the interceptor is that
it's not something that would be touched by users but would only be
modified by cluster admins. So, I think we'd still need to include the
parameters the parameters on the ProducerConfig.
I already have the other appro
Il Sab 3 Apr 2021, 11:56 Lari Hotari ha scritto:
> +1.
>
> For disabling, one could create a new TestNG group which just doesn't get
> run at all (or get runs without a failure blocking PR merge). Perhaps we
> could call this group "quarantine" or "quarantined"?
>
Works for me
Enrico
>
> -Lari
+1.
For disabling, one could create a new TestNG group which just doesn't get
run at all (or get runs without a failure blocking PR merge). Perhaps we
could call this group "quarantine" or "quarantined"?
-Lari
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021, 12:06 Enrico Olivelli, wrote:
> I propose to disable those tests
I propose to disable those tests and unblock CI and create blocker issues
for 2.8.0 release.
Issue are probably already present and I see a few PRs about tentative
fixes.
Does this sound good?
Enrico
Il Ven 2 Apr 2021, 20:32 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto:
> Jonathan
> I am not aware of commits th
I propose to cut the first 2.7.2RC on April 12th.
Is this a good trade off?
Enrico
Il Gio 1 Apr 2021, 22:56 Michael Marshall ha
scritto:
> After discussing this issue in the Pulsar community meeting today, I
> realized that I might not have described the issue well enough. The
> fundamental
