Re: [DISCUSS] Log Levels for Broker's ServerCnx Class

Thanks for your replies Chris and Joshua. I agree that it is challenging to find the right balance with log levels and that it can come down to preference. However, I think it's telling that you both have implemented work arounds because the logging is too verbose right now. It's unlikely we'll fi

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] nkurihar commented on pull request #109: Bump the master version to 1.3.0

nkurihar commented on pull request #109: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/109#issuecomment-784752621 @lxcid Sorry for delay of the release. We're planning the next release in March. This is an automa

Re: PIP: Message filtering expression

Hi Penghui, We want to be able to seek a consumer’s position based on flexible expression in addition to publish time or a message id. And the same mechanism can be used to filter out message on either broker or client side and sharing the same code base. It’s good to know there is an discussio

Re: PIP: Message filtering expression

Hi Xiaoguang, Thanks for drafting this proposal. There is a related discussion in the community before, you can get from https://lists.apache.org/list.html?*@pulsar.apache.org:lte=1y:Proposal%20for%20Consumer%20Filtering%20in%20Pulsar%20brokers

[GitHub] [pulsar-presto] holmes07 opened a new issue #4: has Those feature supported yet?

holmes07 opened a new issue #4: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-presto/issues/4 Resource Isolation/Management Throttling Priorities This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the messa

Re: Publishing new version of Pulsar Build Docker image

Thanks Enrico Il giorno mar 23 feb 2021 alle ore 10:43 Yong Zhang < zhangyong1025...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I have pushed the old image. > > We can push a new image with a new tag after the issue is addressed. > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 16:09, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > I am sorry. > > I su

Re: Publishing new version of Pulsar Build Docker image

I have pushed the old image. We can push a new image with a new tag after the issue is addressed. On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 16:09, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I am sorry. > I supposed that the new image would have had a new tag and that it did not > override the previous one. > > Can we push the old

Re: Publishing new version of Pulsar Build Docker image

I am sorry. I supposed that the new image would have had a new tag and that it did not override the previous one. Can we push the old image to docker hub ? In the meantime we can add the missing dependencies to the Dockerfile Enrico Il giorno mar 23 feb 2021 alle ore 08:42 Yong Zhang < zhangyon