DonghunLouisLee commented on issue #72:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/issues/72#issuecomment-728746553
> As a comment, for GCS it did not work just adding
>
> `broker: configData: managedLedgerOffloadDriver: google-cloud-storage
gcsManagedLedgerOffloadBucket: puls
naveen1100 commented on pull request #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/77#issuecomment-728707841
@sijie Thank you
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
*I also have few concerns with the PIP by introducing server side filtering
and processing in dispatch path. Filtering on unbounded tag list will make
computation unpredictable and that will be definitely a problem to define
the capacity model and can be a big problem of noisy neighbors in a
multi-
xuesongxs opened a new issue #353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/353
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b196b/b196ba6a5063509161f2779ebe97a4f12cbea764" alt="image"
enum State {
Uninitialized, // Cursor is being initialized
sijie merged pull request #14:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/14
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
zymap opened a new pull request #14:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/14
---
*Motivation*
https://github.blog/changelog/2020-10-01-github-actions-deprecating-set-env-and-add-path-commands/
Joe - Very comprehensive writeup!
> So my vote is not to allow this (and any other server side logic
implementations) into the base dispatcher, but permit these kinds of
changes as configurable dispatchers. I hope I have explained the reasons
for that vote clearly.
+1. We can do it in a way like
Sorry, for the top post.
I was reading what you wrote and knew where you were heading.
Couldn’t these filtering functions / dispatchers be a special configuration of
functions?
(1) Topic
(2) Filtered function
(3) Filtered topic
Isn’t the whole point of Functions to compute, filter, and distrib
We have had discussions in the community list on server side logic
previously. I would like to keep the specific proposal in this PIP aside,
and address what this PIP is implicitly changing in core Pulsar design. I
want to have an explicit discussion on that topic: what is the path for
server-sid
Andre,
I left a comment on the pull request. But I will just copy them here as
well.
I have a couple of comments and one suggestion.
1. What is the performance & GC implication with this change? I think most
of the questions on this pull request is about the performance & GC
implication. It woul
axel-sirota commented on issue #72:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/issues/72#issuecomment-728042806
As a comment, for GCS it did not work just adding
`broker:
configData:
managedLedgerOffloadDriver: google-cloud-storage
gcsManagedLedgerOffloadBuc
Cool, PR is merged, I will start the 2.7.0 release process soon.
Thanks,
Penghui
Penghui
On Nov 16, 2020, 9:19 PM +0800, Enrico Olivelli , wrote:
> Penghui,
> as BK 4.12.0 has been released to Maven Central, the upgrade in Pulsar is
> ready to land
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/8447
>
>
Penghui,
as BK 4.12.0 has been released to Maven Central, the upgrade in Pulsar is
ready to land
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/8447
still needs review, but all tests in CI passed
thank you for driving the release
Enrico
Il giorno mar 10 nov 2020 alle ore 10:30 xiaolong ran <
ranxiaolong
Sure, please feel free to copy the doc to wiki pages. It's mainly text so can
be converted easily.
Cheers,
Andre
-Original Message-
From: Sijie Guo
Sent: 13 November 2020 19:08
To: Dev
Subject: Re: Proposal for Consumer Filtering in Pulsar brokers
Andre,
Is it possible to put it in a
PIP 70 seems a different use case based on "seek"ing rather than filtering.
Possibly it could be used for some sort of basic "tag" to filter on as well but
not sure.
Andre
-Original Message-
From: Jia Zhai
Sent: 15 November 2020 14:53
To: Dev
Subject: Re: Proposal for Consumer Filteri
+1 (binding)
On Nov 12, 2020, 12:53 PM +0800, Hiroyuki Sakai , wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verify checksum
> - Verify gpg key
> - Run producer and consumer
>
> Regards,
> Hiroyuki
>
> From: xiaolong ran
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 19:53
> To: dev@pulsar.ap
16 matches
Mail list logo