Not at all. Thanks for the review, actually!
I think it's a good idea to name it polaris-bin-{version}.tgz or
polaris-{version}-bin.tgz, which indicates that it's a binary
distribution, not a source distribution. Let me make the change.
Yufei
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 2:31 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
Yes both is ok.
For convenience, having distributions available on dist/download, maven
central and by extend on docker hub is a good thing for the users.
Especially for Maven Central, it’s very convenient because people can
easily create custom distributions using the maven-assembly-plugin for
in
Hey Dmitri,
> Would you be able to share any detailed performance test numbers for the
new JDBC Persistence implementation?
Please find the number of the below which i used in the above setup:
Test case | Implementation | Query| Number of
requests | Number of successful
Thanks, Yufei! I added some comments in GH despite the "draft" PR status. I
hope you do not mind :)
Overall, using one distribution archive both for the server and the admin
tool makes sense to me.
4. Standardized the binary distribution package naming to
polaris-{version}.tgz and polaris-{ver
Thanks JB for the clarification! To make it clear, I assume it's also OK to
not publish the binary bundle to maven repo, but only the ASF's official
distribution directories(https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/).
Yufei
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> To be
To be clear
1. The only required distribution from ASF is source distribution
2. for convenience we publish the binary distributions in both
dist/download and Maven Central
Maven Repository can host any artifacts, and it's convenient for users.
Almost all Apache projects do that and that's total
Hi
Yes, that's expected, and we do that in a lot of Apache projects:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/6.1.6/
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/karaf/apache-karaf/4.4.7/
etc
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 8:00 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
>
> We published the
+1. Thanks Jonas!
Yufei
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 9:56 PM Honah J. wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to propose extending the management API specification to add
> policy-related privileges and making Policy a valid securable for
> "addGrantToCatalogRole" and "revokeGrantFromCatalogRole". This
Hi Folk,
Thanks a lot for the discussion. Here is the PR(
https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1589) to merge the binary
distribution while still keeping module polaris-quarkus-admin and
polaris-quarkus-server separately.
*What’s included in the PR:*
1. Introduced a new module that combines
We published the binary distribution bundle to the Maven repository in RC2.
You can see it here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepolaris-1012/org/apache/polaris/polaris-quarkus-server/0.10.0-beta-incubating/
Are we supposed to do that? From my understanding, the Maven
Hi folks,
I opened all the PRs for 0.10.0-beta-incubating-rc3:
* https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1573
* https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1565
* https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1562
* https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1561
* https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1560
I wi
11 matches
Mail list logo
