NB: gradlew is not a binary file, but I think it would be great to
address .keep and *.typed.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 7:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> I found that the source distribution includes binaries, especially
> gradlew, .keep, *.typed, it has to exclud
+1
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 10:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
> Polaris 0.9.0-incubating release.
>
> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-0.9.0-incubating-rc1
> *
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/
-1 (binding)
I found that the source distribution includes binaries, especially
gradlew, .keep, *.typed, it has to excluded from the source
distribution
I will cancel this vote to fix that in rc2.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 7:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I pro
Hi Yufei
Not sure we got consensus in all details but the overall picture is ok for
me.
Let’s continue the details definition in the PR.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
Le jeu. 14 nov. 2024 à 02:39, Yufei Gu a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> Thank you for joining the table maintenance discussion today! We m
NB: rat is executed via gradle. The excludes are defined in the gradle
configuration. You should use the same excludes if you run rat standalone.
The files you are mentioning are actually part of the excludes.
Regards
JB
Le lun. 18 nov. 2024 à 23:02, Kevin Liu a écrit :
> +1 non-binding.
>
> Do
OK, in that case :) +1
I also built and ran all tests, checked checksums and worried about
licensing issues
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 5:10 PM Kevin Liu wrote:
> I don't think there's a license issue. Looks like there's already a RAT
> check in the build steps.
>
> https://github.com/apache/polari
I don't think there's a license issue. Looks like there's already a RAT
check in the build steps.
https://github.com/apache/polaris/blob/e46c6cbb61e69dcb12775fa262c09437f8ee8a28/build.gradle.kts#L59-L124
And the files listed above are excluded.
Best,
Kevin Liu
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 3:03 PM Rus
Shouldn't we fix the license issues before the release? Seems like an
important and easy thing to do. I also think we should be excluding the
"site" directory from the release?
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:56 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Validated sha512 and signature.
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
Validated sha512 and signature.
Cheers,
Dmitri.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 3:16 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Dmitri
>
> I updated dist with the correct sha512.
>
> I noticed several gradle issues during the release (in signature,
> maven publication, etc). I will create th
+1 non-binding.
Downloaded artifacts, verified signatures, checksums, and licenses (see
below).
Ran tests successfully.
```
curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/polaris/KEYS -o
KEYS
gpg --import KEYS
svn checkout
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/0.9.0
Hi Folks,
First PR is out. Please take a look.
https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/457/files
Yufei
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 5:39 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> Thank you for joining the table maintenance discussion today! We made
> significant progress, and here are the key takeawa
Hi Dmitri
I updated dist with the correct sha512.
I noticed several gradle issues during the release (in signature,
maven publication, etc). I will create the issues/PRs to fix that with
the release process documentation.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 3:03 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
>
Hi Dmitri
Yes, it's normal: the KEYS file contains the keys of the release
manager. As I'm the first release manager, it contains my key.
Release managers will add their key in the KEYS file.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 2:53 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
>
> Hi JB,
>
> I can see only you
Hi
That’s cause of the gradle plugin.
I will update the file on dist.
Le lun. 18 nov. 2024 à 15:03, Dmitri Bourlatchkov
a écrit :
> I noticed that the apache-polaris-0.9.0-incubating.sha512 file contains the
> right hash, but it's format does not match the output of `sha512sum
> apache-polaris
I noticed that the apache-polaris-0.9.0-incubating.sha512 file contains the
right hash, but it's format does not match the output of `sha512sum
apache-polaris-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz` -- files names are not listed after
hashes...
As a result, sha512sum -c apache-polaris-0.9.0-incubating.sha512 ret
Hi JB,
I can see only your key (one) in the KEYS file... Is that normal?
Thanks,
Dmitri.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 1:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
> Polaris 0.9.0-incubating release.
>
> * This corresponds t
16 matches
Mail list logo
