Similar to Nick and others. I have time to pay attention, but not as
much as I'd like to contribute. Always hopeful... So, y, I'm still
interested. Thank you for calling roll and all of your work on POI
and beyond!
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 12:06 PM Nick Burch wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2023, PJ Fa
Thanks Dave for your response.
The CI builds (on Jenkins) and links to them are provided at
https://poi.apache.org/devel/nightly.html
It might be a good idea to revisit some of those pages to provide some more
detail.
The Github CI build is of limited use because the builds only kick off for
yes, fully aware of many of these points. i'll continue to contribute
when/where able.
TIA
Stanton Fisque
principal technologist
latticeware.com
portland, oregon
> On Mar 3, 2023, at 10:53 AM, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Thanks Hamza and Stanton for expressing an interest in contributing to POI.
I can't devote much time at the moment, but I do plan to come back,
although not sure how soon it will be.
I'm also monitoring the mailing list and use the latest releases at my day
job.
Regards,
Yegor
пт, 3 мар. 2023 г., 18:26 PJ Fanning :
> Hi everyone,
>
> Apologies if anyone thinks I'm goi
Thanks Hamza and Stanton for expressing an interest in contributing to POI.
For newbies, the best place to start is https://poi.apache.org/devel/index.html
The documentation is basic but the tools we use are well documented on the web.
Subversion, Git, Gradle.
If you any specific questions, the
Hi PJ,
I still monitor the project, and would, as over a decade ago be a third +1, if
needed.
Thank you for your leadership. More inline.
> On Mar 3, 2023, at 6:26 AM, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Apologies if anyone thinks I'm going in the wrong direction here. The TLDR
> is: I
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023, PJ Fanning wrote:
Apologies if anyone thinks I'm going in the wrong direction here. The
TLDR is: I am asking if PMC members could respond with whether they are
still interested in working on POI or if they are no longer in a
position to help.
Still here, still watching, bu
i am not a PMC member, BUT as one of the multitude of contributors interested
in the liveliness of POI, i am curious what is involved with keeping this
project alive and moving (even if it is at a modest rate)?
Stanton Fisque
principal technologist
latticeware.com
portland, oregon
> On Mar 3,
I'm interested on working on tickets but I'm having issues setting up my
Dev environment.
Are there any resources you can point me to?
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023, 14:26 PJ Fanning, wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Apologies if anyone thinks I'm going in the wrong direction here. The TLDR
> is: I am asking if
Hi everyone,
Apologies if anyone thinks I'm going in the wrong direction here. The TLDR is:
I am asking if PMC members could respond with whether they are still interested
in working on POI or if they are no longer in a position to help.
There appears to only be a couple of POI PMC members that
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
The code is pretty stable and widely used.
The volunteer community is not big enough to make every change that people
request. Generally, if you want a feature or a bug fixed, you should probably
think about
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #5 from javifinar...@hotmail.com ---
hahah the patch could be to remove the function hahaha
if the case is tested, maybe that would be enough
regarding POI being active, you mean that is stable enough that doesn´t receive
much chan
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
We're not going to remove code that's been there for 12 years.
POI is not very active dev wise any more.
If you want to investigate a solution, please go ahead. Open a new issue if you
want to go this route.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
javifinar...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||javifinar...@hotmail.com
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
