Re: Proposal: Deprecate Google Docs for Design Docs

+1 Thanks, Dinesh On Mon, Apr 14, 2025, 1:42 PM Ritesh Shukla wrote: > Hi, > > We should shift our design discussions from Google Docs to Markdown files > managed through GitHub Pull Requests. This approach would: > >1. Keep our discussions in the same system as our code, creating a more >

Re: [VOTE] Change the default branch for ozone-site from asf-site to master

+1 Thanks, Dinesh On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 7:14 PM Ethan Rose wrote: > Hi Ozone devs, > > I’d like to start a vote thread to change the default branch in the > apache/ozone-site repo from > asf-site > to master. Changing the default branch requires an Infra

Re: Improving the Apache Ozone Website and Documentation

+1 , this is a much needed improvement. Thanks, Dinesh On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:25 PM Ethan Rose wrote: > Hello Ozone Community, > > As many of you are aware, Ozone's website and documentation has remained > somewhat disorganized and lacking in content for a while. I would like to > kick star

Re: [DISCUSS] How many days to wait if no response from reviewer?

+1. 15 days can be too long and and especially the new contributors would feel more stalled. As long as the reviewer's comments are addressed and there is at least 1 binding +1, it should be totally fine to go ahead. Thanks, Dinesh On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:30 AM Neil Joshi wrote: > +1 > > On

Re: [VOTE] Merge Ozone Erasure Coding branch (HDDS-3816-ec) into master

+1 for merge, it will be good to have people use it. Cheers, Dinesh On Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 10:51 AM Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > +1 > Thanks for all the work on this feature. > > Thanks, > > Mukul > > On 13/04/22 9:01 am, Sammi Chen wrote: > > +1 for the merge. > > > > Thanks a lot to Uma and all

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to merge Ozone Erasure Coding branch (HDDS-3816-ec) into master

+1 to merge. Thanks, Dinesh On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:44 AM mingchao zhao wrote: > +1 for merge EC to master. > > Thanks Uma for pushing this forward. > > guimark 于2022年2月18日周五 14:17写道： > > > +1 > > Great works from Uma, Stephen, Istvan, Markton and all Ozone EC > developers! > > > > > > We'l

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC2

+1 binding 1. Verified checksums/signatures 2. Built from sources 3. Verified basic shell commands on a 3 node cluster 4. Verified basic UI functionality Thank you, Dinesh On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:55 AM Prashant Pogde wrote: > This is a new Voting thread for Ozone 1.1.0 RC2. > > This Ozone 1.

Re: [VOTE] - Merge SCM-HA Branch - HDDS-2823

+1, the work done here is truly impressive, great collaboration/communication. Thanks, Dinesh On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 5:58 AM Shashikant Banerjee wrote: > Hey all, > > The support for SCM HA for ozone has been put together in: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-2823 > > The github f

Re: [DISCUSS] State of Ozone CSI support

+1 thanks Marton for the details/background, it really helps to answer all the questions. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:57 PM Elek, Marton wrote: > > If we simplify the picture, the two biggest Apache Ozone advantages > compared with HDFS are the following (IMHO!): > > 1. better scalability: it c

Re: [PROPOSAL] Go client for ozone

+1, Go is surely being adopted very well so this can attract some new devs too to contribute to Ozone. On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 5:53 AM Elek, Marton wrote: > > Hi, > > Earlier I had some experiments with creating a native go-lang client for > Ozone. > > Go has good integration with native libraries,

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.1.0 release

thread if he wants to still be on the RM for > 1.1. > > Best, > Sid > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:08 PM Shashikant Banerjee > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Thanks > > Shashi > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:32 AM Dinesh Chitlangia > > wr

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.1.0 release

Hi Arpit, Thanks for initiating this thread. +1 for a new release. I am happy to take the role of RM unless someone has already indicated interest. Thanks, Dinesh On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:02 PM Arpit Agarwal wrote: > Hi all, it has been some time since the Ozone 1.0.0 release. Would this be >

Re: Enabling Ratis on OM by default

+1 On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:35 PM Hanisha Koneru wrote: > Hi All, > > I am proposing to enable Ratis by default on Ozone Manager - HDDS-4498 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4498>. > > Ratis on OM has been tested extensively and is stable now. > > HDDS-4330 is an on-going effort

Re: [DISCUSS] new, separated repositories for each type of docker images

Marton, These suggestions are a definite +1 for me. -Dinesh On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:49 AM Elek, Marton wrote: > > > Hi, > > Today https://github.com/apache/ozone-docker repository contains the > source of apache/ozone, apache/ozone-runner and apache/ozone-build > docker images. > > As we had a