Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

2021-04-09 Thread Aravindan Vijayan
+1 to merging this feature. Rakesh, I will work with you to onboard this onto upgrades, which is also close to merge. On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 8:35 AM Ayush Saxena wrote: > Thanx Rakesh for driving this. > Quickly tried some basic stuff with this. Looks good. > > +1, Good Luck!!! > > -Ayush > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Go client for ozone

2021-04-09 Thread Mukul Kumar Singh
Thanks Marton for the reply. I was confused with the last reply on the thread which points to         Thanks the positive feedback. Will cleanup existing code to create a proper initial patch, soon.         I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4977 to follow the progress. S

Re: [PROPOSAL] Go client for ozone

2021-04-09 Thread Elek, Marton
Thank you the feedback, Mukul. Fair point. I reverted[1] the current files and uploaded again as a pull request. Feel free to review it (happy to cut it smaller pieces but I think it's quite simple even in this form. Biggest part is the imported proto + generated files). https://github.com

[DISCUSS] Re: Deprecating ReplicationFactor and introducing ReplicationConfig

2021-04-09 Thread Uma gangumalla
Hi All, Please raise if you have any concerns. Otherwise we will move forward with this approach. Regards, Uma On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 5:12 AM Elek, Marton wrote: > > Thanks the feedback Arpit, > > We don't need to replace the old replcationFactor field, we can keep it > for compatibility r

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

2021-04-09 Thread Ayush Saxena
Thanx Rakesh for driving this. Quickly tried some basic stuff with this. Looks good. +1, Good Luck!!! -Ayush > On 09-Apr-2021, at 2:15 PM, Shashikant Banerjee > wrote: > +1 > > Thanks > Shashi > >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 1:39 PM Sadanand Shenoy < >> sadanand.shenoy4...@gmail.com> wrote: >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Go client for ozone

2021-04-09 Thread Mukul Kumar Singh
I see that the code in https://github.com/apache/ozone-go repository was committed without any code reviews and design. The code was merged without any Apache jira, design or reviews. The Apache way of code contribution was not followed in this case. We should revert the repository to no com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC2

2021-04-09 Thread Elek, Marton
+1 Thanks for the update. 1. checked the signatures 2. checked the sha512sum -c 3. built it from the source 4. created docker image from the binary package and deployed to Kubernetes and executed freon test 5. executed ./test.sh locally from compose/ozone 6. checked `ozone version` 7. Compare

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

2021-04-09 Thread Shashikant Banerjee
+1 Thanks Shashi On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 1:39 PM Sadanand Shenoy < sadanand.shenoy4...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, Thanks for working on this feature. > > Regards, > Sadanand > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, 11:05 PM Rakesh Radhakrishnan > wrote: > > > Thank you very much Yiqun and Marton for the feedback/u

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC2

2021-04-09 Thread Attila Doroszlai
> https://home.apache.org/~prashantpogde/ozone-1.1.0-rc2/ Thanks Prashant for updating to RC2. +1 * Verified signatures, checksums * Verified source matches ozone-1.1.0-RC2 tag * Verified `ozone version` (version number, git revision) * Built from source without local Maven cache * Executed upgr

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

2021-04-09 Thread Sadanand Shenoy
+1, Thanks for working on this feature. Regards, Sadanand On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, 11:05 PM Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > Thank you very much Yiqun and Marton for the feedback/useful comments. > Please find my responses below. > > @Yiqun, > As per the discussions, key deletion tasks have been imple

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

2021-04-09 Thread Lokesh Jain
Thanks for working on this feature! +1 Regards Lokesh > On 08-Apr-2021, at 11:05 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > > Thank you very much Yiqun and Marton for the feedback/useful comments. > Please find my responses below. > > @Yiqun, > As per the discussions, key deletion tasks have been impl