> On 7/28/15 3:19 AM, Finucane, Stephen wrote:
> For what it's worth, I also think that something like Gerrit would be
> useful given the number of platforms that OVS is running on. Right
> now, it's seems like we're doing the human-powered version, which is
> Guru, Daniele, or
On 7/28/15 3:19 AM, Finucane, Stephen wrote:
For what it's worth, I also think that something like Gerrit would be
useful given the number of platforms that OVS is running on. Right
now, it's seems like we're doing the human-powered version, which is
Guru, Daniele, or Ben complain when something
> > > For what it's worth, I also think that something like Gerrit would be
> > > useful given the number of platforms that OVS is running on. Right
> > > now, it's seems like we're doing the human-powered version, which is
> > > Guru, Daniele, or Ben complain when something breaks Windows, DPDK,
>
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 04:18:08PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:45:42AM +, Pritesh Kothari (
> On Jul 18, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> I'm happy to encourage people to submit changes via Github, as an
> experiment.
>
> I don't know of a way to experiment with Gerrit, because Gerrit wants
> exclusive access to your repository. There is a Gerrit service for
There is actually
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 04:18:08PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:45:42AM +, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth) wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Jul 13, 2015, at 9:40
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:45:42AM +, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth) wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Jul 13, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:34:14AM +
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:45:42AM +, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth) wrote:
> >
> > > On Jul 13, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:34:14AM +, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth)
> wrote:
> > >> How about auto
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:45:42AM +, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth) wrote:
>
> > On Jul 13, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:34:14AM +, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth) wrote:
> >> How about automating this using travis and gerrit, so no commit gets in
> >> un
> On Jul 13, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:34:14AM +, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth) wrote:
>> How about automating this using travis and gerrit, so no commit gets in
>> unless it passes sanity tests? This also simplifies review process as well.
>
> Travis do
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:34:14AM +, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth) wrote:
> How about automating this using travis and gerrit, so no commit gets in
> unless it passes sanity tests? This also simplifies review process as well.
Travis doesn't test the kernel module, and as far as I know it can't.
Hi Ben,
How about automating this using travis and gerrit, so no commit gets in
unless it passes sanity tests? This also simplifies review process as well.
Regards,
Pritesh
> On Jul 13, 2015, at 5:14 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Lately I've starting hearing about commits breaking the Windows kerne
12 matches
Mail list logo
