On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:13:15AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 10 July 2013 19:03, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > (The usual reason for ppoll() is to ensure atomicity of changing the signal
> > mask and blocking, but time_poll() does not need atomicity. Therefore,
> > even a userspace emulated ppoll() woul
On 10 July 2013 19:03, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> (The usual reason for ppoll() is to ensure atomicity of changing the signal
> mask and blocking, but time_poll() does not need atomicity. Therefore,
> even a userspace emulated ppoll() would work here in a race-free manner, if
> the kernel does not suppor
