On 10 July 2013 19:03, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > (The usual reason for ppoll() is to ensure atomicity of changing the signal > mask and blocking, but time_poll() does not need atomicity. Therefore, > even a userspace emulated ppoll() would work here in a race-free manner, if > the kernel does not support ppoll().)
And we'll need that userspace emulated ppoll() for non-Linux systems; seem reasonable to just implement it in timeval.c inside an #ifndef HAVE_PPOLL from autoconf? X-CudaMail-Whitelist-To: dev@openvswitch.org _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
