* Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Kyle Mestery (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
> >> + udp_encap_enable();
> >
> > This is a new function, did you provide a fallback/noop (since it looks
> > like it's meant to build back to
On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Kyle Mestery (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> /kmemdup.c
>> /loop_counter.c
>> /modules.order
>> +/net_namespace.c
>> /netdevice.c
>> /net_namespace.c
>> /random32.c
>
> spurious change?
>
>> @@ -39,5 +40,6 @@
>> /vport-in
* Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> > Right. OTV is commonly, but not exclusively, used now. Post draft
> > we should expect a final port number. But it's a relatively small set
> > of functionality to maintain to keep the
On Nov 28, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Chris Wright
wrote:
> * Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
>> On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Chris Wright
>> wrote:
>>> * Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Kyle Mestery
* Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Chris Wright
> wrote:
> > * Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
> >> On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >>> * Kyle Mestery (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
> +
> +vx
On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Chris Wright
wrote:
> * Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>> * Kyle Mestery (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
+
+ vxlan_port->port = dst_port;
+ vxlan_port->count++;
+ hlist_add_
* Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Kyle Mestery (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
> >> +
> >> + vxlan_port->port = dst_port;
> >> + vxlan_port->count++;
> >> + hlist_add_head(&vxlan_port->hash_node,
> >> + vxl
On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Kyle Mestery (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> /kmemdup.c
>> /loop_counter.c
>> /modules.order
>> +/net_namespace.c
>> /netdevice.c
>> /net_namespace.c
>> /random32.c
>
> spurious change?
>
>> @@ -39,5 +40,6 @@
>> /vport-in
On Nov 27, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> Note: v4 of this patch removes VXLAN over IPSEC support,
>> per an offline conversation with Jesse.
>>
>> Add support for VXLAN tunnels to Open vSwitch. Add support
>> for setting the des
* Kyle Mestery (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote:
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> /kmemdup.c
> /loop_counter.c
> /modules.order
> +/net_namespace.c
> /netdevice.c
> /net_namespace.c
> /random32.c
spurious change?
> @@ -39,5 +40,6 @@
> /vport-internal_dev.c
> /vport-netdev.c
> /vport-patch.c
> +/vport-vxl
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> Note: v4 of this patch removes VXLAN over IPSEC support,
> per an offline conversation with Jesse.
>
> Add support for VXLAN tunnels to Open vSwitch. Add support
> for setting the destination UDP port on a per-port basis.
> This is done by ad
On Nov 27, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:19:24 -0500
> Kyle Mestery wrote:
>
>> Note: v4 of this patch removes VXLAN over IPSEC support,
>> per an offline conversation with Jesse.
>>
>> Add support for VXLAN tunnels to Open vSwitch. Add support
>> for setti
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:19:24 -0500
Kyle Mestery wrote:
> Note: v4 of this patch removes VXLAN over IPSEC support,
> per an offline conversation with Jesse.
>
> Add support for VXLAN tunnels to Open vSwitch. Add support
> for setting the destination UDP port on a per-port basis.
> This is done by
13 matches
Mail list logo
