* Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote: > On Nov 28, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Chris Wright <chr...@sous-sol.org> wrote: > > Right. OTV is commonly, but not exclusively, used now. Post draft > > we should expect a final port number. But it's a relatively small set > > of functionality to maintain to keep the extra flexbility. In which > > case, I think the refcounting needs to be re-reviewed as it looked > > suspect to me. > > Makes sense. I'll eyeball the refcounting as well while making all the other > changes you and Jesse suggested.
OK, cool. thanks, -chris _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
