I had missed those counters. I think they more accurately reflect
what we want, so I'll drop this patch.
Ethan
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 06:51:32PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Since port additions and deletions can be very expensive, it makes
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 06:51:32PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Since port additions and deletions can be very expensive, it makes
> sense to keep coverage for them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
I think these duplicate the dpif_port_add and dpif_port_del counters.
(If you think that ofproto
