On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Loftus, Ciara
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:13:22PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> >> >> Tunnel metadata can be substantially larger
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Loftus, Ciara
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:13:22PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> >> Tunnel metadata can be substantially larger than our existing fields
> >> >> (up to 124 bytes in a sing
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:13:22PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> >> Tunnel metadata can be substantially larger than our existing fields
>> >> (up to 124 bytes in a single Geneve opti
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:13:22PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> Tunnel metadata can be substantially larger than our existing fields
> >> (up to 124 bytes in a single Geneve option) so this extends the size
> >> of the data that we can h
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:13:22PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> Tunnel metadata can be substantially larger than our existing fields
>> (up to 124 bytes in a single Geneve option) so this extends the size
>> of the data that we can handle with me
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:13:22PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Tunnel metadata can be substantially larger than our existing fields
> (up to 124 bytes in a single Geneve option) so this extends the size
> of the data that we can handle with metaflow fields. This also
> breaks a few tests that assum
