On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:13:22PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: > Tunnel metadata can be substantially larger than our existing fields > (up to 124 bytes in a single Geneve option) so this extends the size > of the data that we can handle with metaflow fields. This also > breaks a few tests that assume that their max size is also the > maximum that can be handled in a field. > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <[email protected]>
Did you look around at all to see whether this will unreasonably blow up any data or algorithms? Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
