On May 23, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> On May 23, 2012, at 10:40 PM, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:44:58AM +0530, Naga Ro
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
> On May 23, 2012, at 10:40 PM, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:44:58AM +0530, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote:
Thanks for the quick response Mr Ben. Ho
On May 23, 2012, at 10:40 PM, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:44:58AM +0530, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote:
>>> Thanks for the quick response Mr Ben. However, I am bit confused on
>>> which part of the code is resp
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:44:58AM +0530, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote:
>> Thanks for the quick response Mr Ben. However, I am bit confused on
>> which part of the code is responsible for the optimizations..
>
> I already told you: ofproto-dpif
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:44:58AM +0530, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response Mr Ben. However, I am bit confused on
> which part of the code is responsible for the optimizations..
I already told you: ofproto-dpif.c.
> FILE: ~/openvswitch/lib/dpif.c
>
> Guessing the fu
Thanks for the quick response Mr Ben. However, I am bit confused on
which part of the code is responsible for the optimizations..
FILE: ~/openvswitch/lib/dpif.c
Guessing the functionality, I found "dpif_flow_put" to be probably
responsible for it. It is being called by "facet_put__" in
~/openvswi
Thanks for the quick response Mr Ben. However, I am bit confused on
which part of the code is responsible for the optimizations..
FILE: ~/openvswitch/lib/dpif.c
Guessing the functionality, I found "dpif_flow_put" to be probably
responsible for it. It is being called by "facet_put__" in
~/openvswi
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:44:45AM +0530, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote:
> Where am I going wrong ? Does the changes I have made really result in
> behavior that I intend to see ?
Code in ofproto-dpif.c "optimizes out" actions that it considers
redundant, including consecutive changes to the VLAN
Hi,
I was working on a hack which can change the behavior of
"mod_vlan_vid" action and behave as "push_vlan" for a quick temporary
OF1.1 support. For this, I changed the following two functions:
(PS: I am using mininet framework)
FILE: ~/openvswitch/datapath/actions.c
FUNCTION:
static struct sk_b
