Thanks for the quick response Mr Ben. However, I am bit confused on which part of the code is responsible for the optimizations..
FILE: ~/openvswitch/lib/dpif.c Guessing the functionality, I found "dpif_flow_put" to be probably responsible for it. It is being called by "facet_put__" in ~/openvswitch/ofproto/ofproto.c which is inturn being called by "facet_install", "facet_revalidate" and "facet_active_timeout" Now, where does optimizations happen ? Also, can you please let me know any way of specifying actions in dpctl so that optimizations doesn't take place ? Also, another strange thing I have found out is that when I commented out "modify_vlan_tci" in ~/openvswitch/datapath/actions.c, it din't throw up any error in make, install time and even at run time using mininet (with ovsk switch and "dpctl actions=mod_vlan_vid:xx,output:yy) Thanks a lot, Rohit On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:44:45AM +0530, Naga Rohit, IIT Guwahati wrote: >> Where am I going wrong ? Does the changes I have made really result in >> behavior that I intend to see ? > > Code in ofproto-dpif.c "optimizes out" actions that it considers > redundant, including consecutive changes to the VLAN without an > intervening output action. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
