I didn't experiment. The dpif-linux fds have the advantage of being
static and unchanging from one iteration to the next. It might be worth
a try later.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:28:45AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Looks good. Do you think there's benefit in using epoll in the main
> poll li
Looks good. Do you think there's benefit in using epoll in the main poll
library?
--Justin
On Nov 22, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> epoll appears to be much more efficient than poll() at least for
> static file descriptor sets. I can't otherwise explain why this
> patch increases netp
epoll appears to be much more efficient than poll() at least for
static file descriptor sets. I can't otherwise explain why this
patch increases netperf CRR performance by 20% above the previous
commit, which is also about a 19% overall improvement versus
the baseline from before the poll_fd_woke(
