Looks good.  Do you think there's benefit in using epoll in the main poll 
library?

--Justin


On Nov 22, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:

> epoll appears to be much more efficient than poll() at least for
> static file descriptor sets.  I can't otherwise explain why this
> patch increases netperf CRR performance by 20% above the previous
> commit, which is also about a 19% overall improvement versus
> the baseline from before the poll_fd_woke() optimization was
> removed.
> ---
> lib/dpif-linux.c |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/dpif-linux.c b/lib/dpif-linux.c
> index 75e4301..d71fa2a 100644
> --- a/lib/dpif-linux.c
> +++ b/lib/dpif-linux.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> #include <poll.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <strings.h>
> +#include <sys/epoll.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> 
> @@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ struct dpif_linux {
>     struct nl_sock *upcall_socks[N_UPCALL_SOCKS];
>     uint32_t nonempty_socks;
>     unsigned int listen_mask;
> +    int epoll_fd;
> 
>     /* Change notification. */
>     struct sset changed_ports;  /* Ports that have changed. */
> @@ -274,6 +276,7 @@ open_dpif(const struct dpif_linux_dp *dp, struct dpif 
> **dpifp)
>     dpif = xzalloc(sizeof *dpif);
>     dpif->port_notifier = nln_notifier_create(nln, dpif_linux_port_changed,
>                                               dpif);
> +    dpif->epoll_fd = -1;
> 
>     dpif_init(&dpif->dpif, &dpif_linux_class, dp->name,
>               dp->dp_ifindex, dp->dp_ifindex);
> @@ -294,6 +297,10 @@ destroy_upcall_socks(struct dpif_linux *dpif)
> {
>     int i;
> 
> +    if (dpif->epoll_fd >= 0) {
> +        close(dpif->epoll_fd);
> +        dpif->epoll_fd = -1;
> +    }
>     for (i = 0; i < N_UPCALL_SOCKS; i++) {
>         nl_sock_destroy(dpif->upcall_socks[i]);
>         dpif->upcall_socks[i] = NULL;
> @@ -1005,12 +1012,28 @@ dpif_linux_recv_set_mask(struct dpif *dpif_, int 
> listen_mask)
>         int i;
>         int error;
> 
> +        dpif->epoll_fd = epoll_create(N_UPCALL_SOCKS);
> +        if (dpif->epoll_fd < 0) {
> +            return errno;
> +        }
> +
>         for (i = 0; i < N_UPCALL_SOCKS; i++) {
> +            struct epoll_event event;
> +
>             error = nl_sock_create(NETLINK_GENERIC, &dpif->upcall_socks[i]);
>             if (error) {
>                 destroy_upcall_socks(dpif);
>                 return error;
>             }
> +
> +            event.events = EPOLLIN;
> +            event.data.u32 = i;
> +            if (epoll_ctl(dpif->epoll_fd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD,
> +                          nl_sock_fd(dpif->upcall_socks[i]), &event) < 0) {
> +                error = errno;
> +                destroy_upcall_socks(dpif);
> +                return error;
> +            }
>         }
> 
>         dpif->nonempty_socks = 0;
> @@ -1100,36 +1123,24 @@ dpif_linux_recv(struct dpif *dpif_, struct 
> dpif_upcall *upcall)
>     }
> 
>     if (!dpif->nonempty_socks) {
> -        struct pollfd pfds[N_UPCALL_SOCKS];
> +        struct epoll_event events[N_UPCALL_SOCKS];
>         int retval;
>         int i;
> 
> -        for (i = 0; i < N_UPCALL_SOCKS; i++) {
> -            pfds[i].fd = nl_sock_fd(dpif->upcall_socks[i]);
> -            pfds[i].events = POLLIN;
> -            pfds[i].revents = 0;
> -        }
> -
>         do {
> -            retval = poll(pfds, N_UPCALL_SOCKS, 0);
> +            retval = epoll_wait(dpif->epoll_fd, events, N_UPCALL_SOCKS, 0);
>         } while (retval < 0 && errno == EINTR);
>         if (retval < 0) {
>             static struct vlog_rate_limit rl = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(1, 1);
> -            VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl, "poll failed (%s)", strerror(errno));
> -        } else if (!retval) {
> -            return EAGAIN;
> +            VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl, "epoll_wait failed (%s)", strerror(errno));
>         }
> 
> -        for (i = 0; i < N_UPCALL_SOCKS; i++) {
> -            if (pfds[i].revents) {
> -                dpif->nonempty_socks |= 1u << i;
> -            }
> +        for (i = 0; i < retval; i++) {
> +            dpif->nonempty_socks |= 1u << events[i].data.u32;
>         }
> -
> -        assert(dpif->nonempty_socks);
>     }
> 
> -    do {
> +    while (dpif->nonempty_socks) {
>         int indx = ffs(dpif->nonempty_socks) - 1;
>         struct nl_sock *upcall_sock = dpif->upcall_socks[indx];
> 
> @@ -1163,7 +1174,7 @@ dpif_linux_recv(struct dpif *dpif_, struct dpif_upcall 
> *upcall)
>                 return error;
>             }
>         }
> -    } while (dpif->nonempty_socks);
> +    }
> 
>     return EAGAIN;
> }
> @@ -1172,15 +1183,12 @@ static void
> dpif_linux_recv_wait(struct dpif *dpif_)
> {
>     struct dpif_linux *dpif = dpif_linux_cast(dpif_);
> -    int i;
> 
>     if (!dpif->listen_mask) {
>        return;
>     }
> 
> -    for (i = 0; i < N_UPCALL_SOCKS; i++) {
> -        nl_sock_wait(dpif->upcall_socks[i], POLLIN);
> -    }
> +    poll_fd_wait(dpif->epoll_fd, POLLIN);
> }
> 
> static void
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to