On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:59:36AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:45AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > * The way that I have split the patchs is still somewhat arbitrary.
> > I wanted to avoid one very large patch to aid review. But a lot of the
> > chagnes are inter-re
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:45AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> * The way that I have split the patchs is still somewhat arbitrary.
> I wanted to avoid one very large patch to aid review. But a lot of the
> chagnes are inter-related, so a bisectable split seems rather difficult.
> None the l
Hi,
This series comprises a fresh batch of proposed changes to introduce
flow-based tunnelling.
At the heart of these changes is the following structure, which
is attached as a pointer to skb->cb.
struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel {
__be64 tun_id;
__u32 tun_flags;
__be32 ipv4_s
