> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of O Mahony,
> Billy
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 11:13 PM
> To: Ben Pfaff
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 1/1] docs: Clarify bonding of DPDK
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 4:45 PM
> To: O Mahony, Billy
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 1/1] docs: Clarify bonding of DPDK
> enabled interfaces.
>
> On Wed,
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 04:33:15PM +0100, billy.o.mah...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Billy O'Mahony
>
> Unlike system interfaces, DPDK enabled interfaces must have their interface
> type explicitly set when used to create bonded ports. Mention this at the
> relevant points in the documentation.
>
From: Billy O'Mahony
Unlike system interfaces, DPDK enabled interfaces must have their interface
type explicitly set when used to create bonded ports. Mention this at the
relevant points in the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Billy O'Mahony
---
FAQ.md |5 +++--
INSTALL.DPD
