>On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:38:13PM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>>
>> >On 04/01/15 at 07:45am, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >What's wrong with setting CFLAGS on the "configure" or "make" command
>> >> >line? This is the standard way to do this with Automake and Autoconf.
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:38:13PM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>
> >On 04/01/15 at 07:45am, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> >>
> >> >What's wrong with setting CFLAGS on the "configure" or "make" command
> >> >line? This is the standard way to do this with Automake and Autoconf.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sure
>On 04/01/15 at 07:45am, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>>
>> >What's wrong with setting CFLAGS on the "configure" or "make" command
>> >line? This is the standard way to do this with Automake and Autoconf.
>> >
>>
>> Sure. However, setting CFLAGS on the command line overwrites any values
>> CFLAGS has
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:41:53AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 04/01/15 at 08:06am, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:34:39AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > > On 04/01/15 at 07:45am, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> > > > Agreed; given the precedent set by OVS_ENABLE_WERROR, I figured that
On 04/01/15 at 08:06am, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:34:39AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > On 04/01/15 at 07:45am, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> > > Agreed; given the precedent set by OVS_ENABLE_WERROR, I figured that
> > > this was the convention.
> >
> > The only reason this still e
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 07:45:10AM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:23:32PM +0100, Mark Kavanagh wrote:
> >> DPDK 2.0 contains an updated implementation of rte_memcopy, which
> >> leverages SSE and AVX instrinsics. In versions of GCC <= 4.8.2, it
> >> has been observe
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:34:39AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 04/01/15 at 07:45am, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> > Agreed; given the precedent set by OVS_ENABLE_WERROR, I figured that
> > this was the convention.
>
> The only reason this still exists is for backwards compatibility
> to not break e
On 04/01/15 at 07:45am, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>
> >What's wrong with setting CFLAGS on the "configure" or "make" command
> >line? This is the standard way to do this with Automake and Autoconf.
> >
>
> Sure. However, setting CFLAGS on the command line overwrites any values
> CFLAGS has attain
>On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:23:32PM +0100, Mark Kavanagh wrote:
>> DPDK 2.0 contains an updated implementation of rte_memcopy, which
>> leverages SSE and AVX instrinsics. In versions of GCC <= 4.8.2, it
>> has been observed that the relevant instrinsics are not defined in
>> gcc headers, resulting
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:23:32PM +0100, Mark Kavanagh wrote:
> DPDK 2.0 contains an updated implementation of rte_memcopy, which
> leverages SSE and AVX instrinsics. In versions of GCC <= 4.8.2, it
> has been observed that the relevant instrinsics are not defined in
> gcc headers, resulting in co
DPDK 2.0 contains an updated implementation of rte_memcopy, which
leverages SSE and AVX instrinsics. In versions of GCC <= 4.8.2, it
has been observed that the relevant instrinsics are not defined in
gcc headers, resulting in compile-time errors.
This issue is resolved by enabling the 'mssse3' flag
11 matches
Mail list logo