> It looks weird cause it's a bug. The condition should be before the
> block. I'll update both patches.
Actually, I only made the mistake in this patch. The other one is fine.
Ethan
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mai
> looks really weird to me, because it calls immediate_wake() on a
> Poller instance that is never afterward used (presumably it gets
> garbage collected).
It looks weird cause it's a bug. The condition should be before the
block. I'll update both patches.
Ethan
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:09:24PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> With this patch, users can query a running ovs-xapi-sync's version
> or ask it to exit using ovs-appctl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
This code:
poller = ovs.poller.Poller()
unixctl_server.wait(poller)
With this patch, users can query a running ovs-xapi-sync's version
or ask it to exit using ovs-appctl.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
.../usr_share_openvswitch_scripts_ovs-xapi-sync| 25 +++-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xenserver/usr_shar