On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 06:24:39PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:11:39PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:40:17PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> > > Also, since all kinds of groups can refer to other groups, there is no
> > > reason to delete indirec
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:11:39PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:40:17PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> > Also, since all kinds of groups can refer to other groups, there is no
> > reason to delete indirect groups first.
>
> This seems reasonable to me, but its not clear
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:40:17PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Also, since all kinds of groups can refer to other groups, there is no
> reason to delete indirect groups first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
I folded this in, thanks.
I've now added you as a co-author, also.
_
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:40:17PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Also, since all kinds of groups can refer to other groups, there is no
> reason to delete indirect groups first.
This seems reasonable to me, but its not clear to me
how the code prevents the deletion of groups that
are still refer
Also, since all kinds of groups can refer to other groups, there is no
reason to delete indirect groups first.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
ofproto/ofproto.c | 20 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto.c b/ofproto/ofproto.c
in
