On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:11:39PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:40:17PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > > Also, since all kinds of groups can refer to other groups, there is no > > reason to delete indirect groups first. > > This seems reasonable to me, but its not clear to me > how the code prevents the deletion of groups that > are still referenced either by other groups or by rules.
I think we might have some problems there. I'm not sure that this patch made it worse, though. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
