On 30/08/2016 18:06, "Daniele Di Proietto" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>On 30/08/2016 15:32, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:41:15AM -0700, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>>> We only changed the MTU of new internal ports if it is bigger than the
>>> bridge minimum. But when the minimum
On 30/08/2016 15:32, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:41:15AM -0700, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>> We only changed the MTU of new internal ports if it is bigger than the
>> bridge minimum. But when the minimum MTU of the bridge is updated we
>> change the MTU of all internal p
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:41:15AM -0700, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> We only changed the MTU of new internal ports if it is bigger than the
> bridge minimum. But when the minimum MTU of the bridge is updated we
> change the MTU of all internal ports no matter what.
>
> The behavior is inconsist
We only changed the MTU of new internal ports if it is bigger than the
bridge minimum. But when the minimum MTU of the bridge is updated we
change the MTU of all internal ports no matter what.
The behavior is inconsistent, because now the internal ports MTU depends
on the order in which the ports
