On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:10:02PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > Please argue out the situation with yourself and get back to me when
> > you've come to a conclusion.
>
> After an intense bout of self directed parliamentary wrangling
> (back-room deals, filibusters, ear marks, late night socrati
> Please argue out the situation with yourself and get back to me when
> you've come to a conclusion.
After an intense bout of self directed parliamentary wrangling
(back-room deals, filibusters, ear marks, late night socratic
dialectics) I've come to the following conclusion:
HFSC drops packets
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:45:17PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > + (Before version 1.6, Open vSwitch would drop all packets destined
> > for
> > + the default queue if no configuration was present.)
>
> Are you sure this is true? My (admittedly fuzzy) memory tells me that
> un-qu
> + (Before version 1.6, Open vSwitch would drop all packets destined for
> + the default queue if no configuration was present.)
Are you sure this is true? My (admittedly fuzzy) memory tells me that
un-queued traffic effectively reduces the size of the pipe for the
queued traffic.
When an interface has QoS configured but no default queue (queue 0), OVS
has until now installed that QoS configuration literally, which causes all
packets destined for this default queue to be dropped. This behavior is
usually both unexpected and undesirable.
This commit changes behavior so that
