On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 01:43:40PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> When poll interval-based logging was introduced a long time, we were
> actively interested in looking at almost every long poll interval. But
> these days, with OVS working rather well, with pretty good latency, most
> of the messages ar
Looks Good.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> When poll interval-based logging was introduced a long time, we were
> actively interested in looking at almost every long poll interval. But
> these days, with OVS working rather well, with pretty good latency, most
> of the messag
When poll interval-based logging was introduced a long time, we were
actively interested in looking at almost every long poll interval. But
these days, with OVS working rather well, with pretty good latency, most
of the messages are red herrings that bother some administrators and
provoke false re