Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] timeval: Check for HAVE_BACKTRACE instead of HAVE_EXECINFO_H.

2013-04-24 Thread Ben Pfaff
Applied, thanks. On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:22:34PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: > Looks good. > > --Justin > > > On Apr 23, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > Other code in the tree uses HAVE_BACKTRACE and then blindly includes > > if it is present, so this doesn't make anything worse

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] timeval: Check for HAVE_BACKTRACE instead of HAVE_EXECINFO_H.

2013-04-23 Thread Justin Pettit
Looks good. --Justin On Apr 23, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Other code in the tree uses HAVE_BACKTRACE and then blindly includes > if it is present, so this doesn't make anything worse. > > Once we do that, HAVE_EXECINFO_H has no further users, so this commit also > removes the che

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] timeval: Check for HAVE_BACKTRACE instead of HAVE_EXECINFO_H.

2013-04-23 Thread Ben Pfaff
Other code in the tree uses HAVE_BACKTRACE and then blindly includes if it is present, so this doesn't make anything worse. Once we do that, HAVE_EXECINFO_H has no further users, so this commit also removes the check for Reported-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff --- configure.ac