Thanks, I've pushed this.
Ethan
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:28, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Thanks, I'm happy with this.
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:27:00AM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> I agree this is a bit subtle. Here's an updated version of the patch.
>>
>> ---
>> A "packet out" ordinarily isn'
Thanks, I'm happy with this.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:27:00AM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> I agree this is a bit subtle. Here's an updated version of the patch.
>
> ---
> A "packet out" ordinarily isn't accounted to any OpenFlow rule,
> because its actions come directly from the controller in
I agree this is a bit subtle. Here's an updated version of the patch.
---
A "packet out" ordinarily isn't accounted to any OpenFlow rule,
because its actions come directly from the controller instead of
from an OpenFlow rule. However, any "resubmit" actions or output
to OFPP_TABLE within the set
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:19:17PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Reported-by: Jesse Gross
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
> ---
>
> Jesse tested this, I've only compiled it.
The patch looks good, but it took me a while to understand the
rationale here. Let me add to your changelog (or you can e
Reported-by: Jesse Gross
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
Jesse tested this, I've only compiled it.
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 12 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
index f5280ff..bcdb1d3 100644
--- a
