On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 01:30:59AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Is there any reason we can't simply ignore the CFI bit? Something like the
> following? I'm having trouble working out exactly how the CFI bit in OpenFlow
> matches interacts with the various versions and the classifier.
OpenFlow 1
Is there any reason we can't simply ignore the CFI bit? Something like the
following? I'm having trouble working out exactly how the CFI bit in OpenFlow
matches interacts with the various versions and the classifier.
Ethan
---
lib/ofp-util.c |9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
d
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 03:00:06PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Without this patch, using ovs-ofctl to add a rule which masks the
> vlan_tci field would not work as expected unless the protocol was
> explicitly set to NXM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
This is the right idea but I think that
Without this patch, using ovs-ofctl to add a rule which masks the
vlan_tci field would not work as expected unless the protocol was
explicitly set to NXM.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
lib/ofp-util.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/ofp-util.c b/lib/ofp-ut
