On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:31:28PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:24:07PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> >> We currently have a version of ipv6_skip_exthdr() which is
>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:31:28PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:24:07PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> We currently have a version of ipv6_skip_exthdr() which is
> >> identical to the main one with the addition of fragm
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:24:07PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> We currently have a version of ipv6_skip_exthdr() which is
>> identical to the main one with the addition of fragment reporting.
>> We can propose our version for upstream and then us
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:24:07PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> We currently have a version of ipv6_skip_exthdr() which is
> identical to the main one with the addition of fragment reporting.
> We can propose our version for upstream and then use it directly
> without duplication.
>
> Signed-off-by
We currently have a version of ipv6_skip_exthdr() which is
identical to the main one with the addition of fragment reporting.
We can propose our version for upstream and then use it directly
without duplication.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross
---
datapath/flow.c| 70 +++
