On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:31:28PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:24:07PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: >> >> We currently have a version of ipv6_skip_exthdr() which is >> >> identical to the main one with the addition of fragment reporting. >> >> We can propose our version for upstream and then use it directly >> >> without duplication. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> >> > >> > The case of a IPv6 fragment header with frag_off of 0 is really odd. ??I >> > guess that this code handles it acceptably (treating it the same as an >> > unfragmented packet) but this new behavior differs, I believe, from >> > userspace treatment of such a packet, and so I believe that the patch >> > should also update lib/flow.c >> >> [...responses...] > > Thanks, all that looks good to me. > > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
Thanks, I pushed it. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
