On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:39:37PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:08:08AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> Both datapath and vport stats contain 64-bit members in a struct
> >> but we write them directly in Netlink attribu
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:08:08AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> Both datapath and vport stats contain 64-bit members in a struct
>> but we write them directly in Netlink attributes which only
>> guarantee 32-bit alignment. This causes problems o
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:08:08AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Both datapath and vport stats contain 64-bit members in a struct
> but we write them directly in Netlink attributes which only
> guarantee 32-bit alignment. This causes problems on RISC
> architectures that care about alignment so this
Both datapath and vport stats contain 64-bit members in a struct
but we write them directly in Netlink attributes which only
guarantee 32-bit alignment. This causes problems on RISC
architectures that care about alignment so this computes the stats
on the stack and then memcpy's them.
Signed-off-
