Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] automake: Always include route-table.h in sources.

2012-11-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
As an experiment, I moved lib/route-table.h into an "if ESX" block, and it still got distributed on a non-ESX build. Also, I notice that the BSD-only .c and .h files still get distributed even on non-BSD. So I think something else must have been at work. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:18:05PM -0800,

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] automake: Always include route-table.h in sources.

2012-11-19 Thread Ethan Jackson
Im pretty sure it did at some point in time. This patch has been sitting in my repo for a long time and I can't seem to figure out what problem I was trying to solve. I'll shelve it for now. Ethan On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:32:01PM -0800, Et

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] automake: Always include route-table.h in sources.

2012-11-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:32:01PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote: > The Linux, ESX, and BSD route table implementations all require > route-table.h. However, it was only being included as a source in > the Linux build. > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson This shouldn't have any effect. It basically

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] automake: Always include route-table.h in sources.

2012-11-19 Thread Ethan Jackson
The Linux, ESX, and BSD route table implementations all require route-table.h. However, it was only being included as a source in the Linux build. Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson --- lib/automake.mk |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/automake.mk b/lib/au