As an experiment, I moved lib/route-table.h into an "if ESX" block, and it still got distributed on a non-ESX build. Also, I notice that the BSD-only .c and .h files still get distributed even on non-BSD.
So I think something else must have been at work. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:18:05PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote: > Im pretty sure it did at some point in time. This patch has been sitting in > my repo for a long time and I can't seem to figure out what problem I was > trying to solve. I'll shelve it for now. > > Ethan > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:32:01PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > > The Linux, ESX, and BSD route table implementations all require > > > route-table.h. However, it was only being included as a source in > > > the Linux build. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com> > > > > This shouldn't have any effect. It basically doesn't matter where you > > list .h files as long as you list them somewhere. > > > > Did this fix any actual bug that you encountered? > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
