[Adding back ovs-dev, hope that's OK]
Hmm, shutting down your QoS effort is not my goal.
What if we consider this patch as the start of an RFC series for the NB
part of QoS and then you work on the implications of pushing it down
through ovn-northd into SB and ovn-controller/OpenFlow? That's whe
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:47:19PM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote:
> If i understand your concern right, you worry that the NB schema is getting
> too big.
> I can't think of a better way to do this both use full and smaller, if you
> feel that we don't want to support
> QoS at this point, thats fine. but
These features are not yet designed in OpenStack API, for Liberty (the next
release) its going to be only
bandwidth limit, but they certainly will be added to the next release as
there is a high demand for them.
I can start trying to propose them, but i think at this point its a waste
of time if th
Could you extend the proposal to include those features then? At the
moment it is a skeleton.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:11:12AM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote:
> Yes, there are currently plans for marking (DSCP) and flow classification
> profiles.
> And other ideas like connections limiting.
>
> On Wed
Yes, there are currently plans for marking (DSCP) and flow classification
profiles.
And other ideas like connections limiting.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 09:21:41AM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote:
> > Add QoS profile and QoS rule tables and explanations
>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 09:21:41AM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote:
> Add QoS profile and QoS rule tables and explanations
> to the NB schema.
> Add specific bandwidth limit rule configurations
> in the document
>
> Signed-off-by: Gal Sagie
This is a lot of schema to support just a little bit of function
Add QoS profile and QoS rule tables and explanations
to the NB schema.
Add specific bandwidth limit rule configurations
in the document
Signed-off-by: Gal Sagie
---
ovn/ovn-nb.ovsschema | 25 ++
ovn/ovn-nb.xml | 72
2 fil
