On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:47:19PM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote: > If i understand your concern right, you worry that the NB schema is getting > too big. > I can't think of a better way to do this both use full and smaller, if you > feel that we don't want to support > QoS at this point, thats fine. but this is another limit for API which will > be supported by OpenStack reference implementation > and not by OVN, and if we aim for high adoption of OVN, we need to make > sure this gap is as small > as possible (at least thats how i see it)
OVSDB really shines when it comes to upgrades that add columns or tables. We do it routinely in OVS. There's basically no reason not to do it later. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
