uot;ofproto-dpif - ICMPv6" or "ofproto-dpif - Neighbor Discovery
> set-field with checksum update".
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 08:29:25PM +0100, Raul Suarez Marin wrote:
> > I was looking something similar to "make check"
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
I was looking something similar to "make check"
Kind regards,
Raúl
2016-01-17 18:47 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff :
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:44:23AM +0100, Raul Suarez Marin wrote:
> > I am developing experimenter match and actions for OF1.3 in openvswitch
> > 2.4.0. I alre
Hello,
I am developing experimenter match and actions for OF1.3 in openvswitch
2.4.0. I already implemented it, but I am missing a way of testing if it
works with real packets.
There is any way to test that or I should have to start ovs and try it out
with real packets in simulated scenarios?
An
ur code isn't executing (are
> you sure that your own custom version of the module is inserted into
> the kernel?)
>
> On 6 August 2015 at 10:52, Raul Suarez Marin
> wrote:
> > Is there a way of adding messages myself and see them thorugh --verbose?
> I
> > was to
Is there a way of adding messages myself and see them thorugh --verbose? I
was told that "printk()" did that but I'm not able to see it anywhere :(
Thank you for your answer,
Kind regards,
Raúl
2015-08-05 22:40 GMT+02:00 Joe Stringer :
> On 5 August 2015 at 13:02, Raul Sua
Hello everyone,
I am developing a new match option in the datapath. I implemented almost
everything already, but I am missing something and I don't know what nor
what is next step.
Adding the flow directly to the datapath gives the following error:
ovs-dpctl: updating flow table (Invalid argument
Hello,
I am developing a new match option for openvswitch and I would like that it
runs through the datapath without need of user-space. I'm not really sure
if I missed something but this is what happens:
(1) First incomming packet is processed correctly (processed + stats
updated)
(2) Following
, you should not need to implement any new actions, as
> you should be able to use the set_field action.
>
> Jarno
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Raul Suarez Marin <
> raul.suarez.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jarno for the hints!
>
> I found this function
nd a
> class struct with the local function pointers in those files, just search
> for “operate” in those files.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Jarno
>
> > On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:06 AM, Raul Suarez Marin <
> raul.suarez.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hel
function is optional. It is only worthwhile to implement it if
* 'dpif' can perform operations in batch faster than individually. */
void (*operate)(struct dpif *dpif, struct dpif_op **ops, size_t n_ops);
Kind regards,
Raúl Suárez
2015-03-18 21:26 GMT+01:00 Raul Suarez Marin :
> H
really.
I will be posting here updates so anyone trying to do this same thing can
have a "clear" idea of what to do.
Thanks again Ben for your help, hints and guidelines.
Kind regards,
Raúl Suárez
2015-03-12 16:06 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff :
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:11:11AM +0100, Raul
g miniflow
allowed me to realize why the match was not going well, so "I am happy"
that I did not understand it and had to go through debugging.
Kind regards,
Raúl
2015-03-14 20:58 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff :
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:59:40PM +0100, Raul Suarez Marin wrote:
> > I
Hello everyone,
I am trying to develop new actions for openvswitch, I have done all my work
but looks like it does not work.
What I have done:
-> Enable ovs to read and parse new actions, so they appear on ovs-ofctl
dump-flows command.
-> Adapted required parts of "handle_upcalls" function
at ofp
Hello,
I need new match options for my openvswitch. I have already sorted out the
flow_mod message handling and everything. Now, I need to find where the
match is performed, but I cannot find it. Through debugging, I found that
the matching is performed (or part of it) at miniflow_extract() at
lib
Thank you very much Ben, your help is appreciated
2015-03-05 2:33 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff :
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:21:42PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:06:14AM +0100, Raul Suarez Marin wrote:
> > > Thank you for your fast response. I configured my o
Hello,
Thank you for your fast response. I configured my ovs with --enable-Werror
and this allowed me to fix a couple warnings (unused variables). Sadly,
looks like all changes that I should have done, are already done.
The changes that the FAQ proposes are related to OF messages and flow entry
i
Hello,
I need new match options for my openvswitch. I have already sorted out the
flow_mod message handling and everything. Now, I need to find where the
match is performed, but I cannot find it.
Anyone has a clue on where packets are processed/matched. ANY clue is
useful.
Thank you for your sup
Solved. I finally know how it works. Sorry for the inconvenience.
2015-02-02 17:04 GMT+01:00 Raul Suarez Marin :
> Hello,
>
> I am looking at decode_openflow10_action function at lib/ofp-actions.c. I
> am trying to understand how the code is performed. I have been testing it,
> bu
} \
break;
#include "ofp-util.def"
f = fopen("/home/raul/file.txt", "ab+");
fprintf(f, " >WTF< 0x%x 0x%x (%d %d) (0x%x %d) (0x%x %d)\n", a->type,
a->header.len, a-
Hello,
I am developing a new module for a controller, but I need to add an extra
action to the openvswitch. I know that ovs 1.4 supports set-field actions,
but that functionality does not work for me because I need to change data
from the packet, not a header.
Currently, I'm stucked at function o
20 matches
Mail list logo
