to:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 7:43 AM
To: Daniel Ye
Cc: Ben Pfaff ; Justin Pettit ; Wenyu
Zhang ; Wang Qiong ; dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ipfix: Add ingress and egress interface in
exporting flows
The odp_ports aren't meaningful at all outside of O
Hi,
Could you please help to put my email address in this alias? I have subscribed
several times, but I didn't get any notifications. Thanks.
Bests,
Daniel Benli Ye
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
nly use the original packet size and the metadata in flow. I
don't get any idea about how
we set 'snaplen' in IPFIX. Is it better to have this field in sample action?
Wait for Ben's input.
Bests,
Daniel
From: William Tu
Sent: Sunday, July 1
Hi William,
I saw that you submitted the patch below. It's about adding 'snaplen' for
sample action and sFlow.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/645013/
I'm still confused whether sFlow uses the openflow sample action. In my
opinion, sFlow only uses the datapath
sample action, not the sample a
CTED PASS” on Windows.
Thanks,
Paul
From: Daniel Ye [mailto:dani...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:28 PM
To: Paul Boca
Subject: RE: Bridge IPFIX statistics check question
Hi Paul,
It’s a test case issue and I am planning to fix it when adding a new test case
like the port usage of sFl
Hi Ben,
Thanks for review. In my opinion, the ofp_port may be the same on different
bridge. If so, we still don’t differentiate the flows
in this scenario. That’s why I choose to use odd_port.
Bests,
Daniel
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 5:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 08:48:43PM -
HI William and Ben,
Thanks for catching and fixing this problem. I applied the patch and tested. The
problem is gone. Thanks.
Bests,
Daniel
> On Jun 27, 2016, at 5:54 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:28:44AM -0700, William Tu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Valgrind reports the error be
OK, I got it and I will handle this.
Bests,
Daniel
> On Jun 25, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 04:12:04AM +0000, Daniel Ye wrote:
>> It’s because of the "packet send error" statistic. The test of checking
>> IPFIX statistics s
Hi Ben,
It’s because of the "packet send error" statistic. The test of checking IPFIX
statistics set collector as “127.0.0.1:4739”.
Test code:
-
dnl Sample every packet using bridge-based sampling.
AT_CHECK([ovs-vsctl -- set bridge br0 ipfix=@fi
Hi Ben,
Please ignore "[ovs-dev,v5] ipfix: support tunnel information for Flow IPFIX"
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/634130/
In patch v5, I changed probability of flow-based IPFIX to support 32 bits
unsigned int. However,
after thinking it over again, 16 bit unsigned int probability which c
Hi Ben,
Yes, my first idea is to do adjust_sample_acion() action in
commit_odp_tunnel_action(), but it can hardly
handle the problem that if there are two or more user world sample action and
each has a sampling_port, like the
last case in my new added testing. We add a flow in the user world l
.
I'm appending a further incremental diff I suggest folding in, because I
noticed a few more style nits.
Thanks,
Ben.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:10:00AM +, Daniel Ye wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review. For the test case, I didn’t get an error in my test
machine. I suspected tha
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review. For the test case, I didn’t get an error in my test
machine. I suspected that IPFIX packets are
not all sent before dump IPFIX stats, so 'sleep 1' is added to make sure all
the IPFIX packets are sent.
Bests,
Daniel Benli Ye
> On Jun 10, 2016, at 5:33 AM, Ben Pfa
s improving the existing
OpenFlow “sample” action.
Some more comments inline below.
On Apr 25, 2016, at 8:48 PM, Daniel Ye
mailto:dani...@vmware.com>> wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review. I have sent a second patch with signed-off tag. Please
review it again.
For your comments, I listed the
,
Daniel Benli Ye
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 12:55 AM
To: Daniel Ye
Cc: Wenyu Zhang; dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Support port level IPFIX
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:55:10PM +0800, Daniel Benli Ye wrote:
&g
15 matches
Mail list logo
