Re: [ovs-dev] UK Shop for Viagra here

2015-04-03 Thread Cornelia
Anything that's bad for your heart is bad for your sexual health. Take care of your body! As some diseases progress, the disease will impact the function of muscular structures of the penis. http://x.co/8JGXl ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org h

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] datapath: Turn vports with dependencies into separate modules

2015-04-03 Thread Thomas Graf
On 04/02/15 at 10:13pm, Pravin Shelar wrote: > Looks good. Thanks for back-porting the patch. > > Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar Thanks for the review. Pushed to master. ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-ctl: Unload vport modules on force-reload-kmod

2015-04-03 Thread Thomas Graf
On 04/02/15 at 10:17pm, Pravin Shelar wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > > We manually rmmod the loaded vports as using modprobe -r > > only works if the modules are available through modules.dep > > > > Upon restart, the vports get automatically reloaded when the > > r

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-macros.at: Try killing a process twice in Windows.

2015-04-03 Thread Gurucharan Shetty
> I'm really happy that you found a solution! (Even though we don't know > the root cause.) Thank you. > > Please credit Alex as the reporter. He raised this issue with me, and I > just passed it along. > > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff Oink. This patch does not fix the problem, so I will not commit it.

[ovs-dev] (no subject)

2015-04-03 Thread dev-bounces
___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [ovs-dev] question about availability of Centos 7.1 kernel support

2015-04-03 Thread Sabyasachi Sengupta
Ben, By "certification" I meant any pre-release testing that you must be doing before releasing a new version of ovs, nothing beyond that.. Its fair to assume that this would be the starting point for many who are using this software. That is, go ahead and grab the latest released version. It

[ovs-dev] Best UK Traded Pills

2015-04-03 Thread Wilford
Although the little blue pill has made many a man happy, there are new drugs on the market. American society proves the efficiency of our male enhancement products! http://x.co/8JGZV ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mail

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-macros.at: Try killing a process twice in Windows.

2015-04-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:32:36PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: > It has been seen recently that the unit tests hang sometimes > while run on Windows. This happens when the OVS daemons don't > get killed after the test finishes. In my reproduction case, > when we use the taskkill command to forc

Re: [ovs-dev] question about availability of Centos 7.1 kernel support

2015-04-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
I recommend building a kernel module from master. New features, such as support for new kernels, are always added on master first. Periodically we branch to a release branch, and then release that branch after allowing some time to report and fix bugs. We do not certify any version of OVS for an

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-macros.at: Try killing a process twice in Windows.

2015-04-03 Thread Gurucharan Shetty
It has been seen recently that the unit tests hang sometimes while run on Windows. This happens when the OVS daemons don't get killed after the test finishes. In my reproduction case, when we use the taskkill command to forcefully kill the process, the following happens: $ taskkill //f //PID 1728

[ovs-dev] fvqhfuvh

2015-04-03 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
The message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Your message was not delivered because the destination server was not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely there i

Re: [ovs-dev] question about availability of Centos 7.1 kernel support

2015-04-03 Thread Sabyasachi Sengupta
Well, the last released version of ovs-2.3.1 was in Dec/03/2014 (per NEWS) and there is no formal plan discussed about ovs-2.4 in any of the mailing lists. I see there is ovs-2.3.2 documented in NEWS with xxx suggesting there will be a release sometime in future. Unless there is a certified an

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] acinclude: Always assume buggy strtok_r() for glibc < 2.8.

2015-04-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
Thanks, applied to master and branch-2.3. On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:15:01PM -0700, Alex Wang wrote: > Thx for fixing this !!!~ > > Acked-by: Alex Wang > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > Lately our internal build system has been seeing intermittent failures that > > I

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] lib/list: Add LIST_FOR_EACH_POP.

2015-04-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 04/03/2015 06:55 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > Makes popping each member of the list a bit easier. > > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme Nice improvement! The changes look good to me. I think one bonus improvement would be to add a test case to tests/test-list.c. Acked-by: Russell Bryant --

Re: [ovs-dev] sFlow extension for tunnels / MPLS - question about user-space flow-cache

2015-04-03 Thread Joe Stringer
Missed this the first time around for some reason. Minor comments inline. On 1 April 2015 at 22:14, Neil McKee wrote: > 1) We can use the concurrent hash-map of flows that the revalidator > threads are sharing. The upcall knows the 128-bit ufid for the flow, so > we can get directly to the com

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] acinclude: Always assume buggy strtok_r() for glibc < 2.8.

2015-04-03 Thread Alex Wang
Thx for fixing this !!!~ Acked-by: Alex Wang On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Lately our internal build system has been seeing intermittent failures that > I can't explain. With old glibc versions, the "configure" time check will > pass, but the equivalent (almost identical)

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] lib/list: Add LIST_FOR_EACH_POP.

2015-04-03 Thread Jarno Rajahalme
Makes popping each member of the list a bit easier. Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme --- lib/dp-packet.c |5 ++--- lib/list.h |6 ++ lib/lldp/lldpd-structs.c |5 ++--- lib/lldp/lldpd.c |5 ++--- lib/mcast-snooping.c |5

[ovs-dev] I am sure you are willing to try anything to get thin again

2015-04-03 Thread Vicky Forman
I tried everything to get in shape Your overall health with improve once you have this. http://x.co/8jbZ9 ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

[ovs-dev] (no subject)

2015-04-03 Thread dev-bounces
___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] stuck with 16-bit ifr_flags in FreeBSD

2015-04-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:46:11PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On 3 April 2015 at 13:46, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > >> > Also, the commit you name was in 2013, and we've had other > >> > contributions from FreeBSD contributors since then > >> > (namely Ed Maste ) and it seems like he > >> > would have no

Re: [ovs-dev] sFlow extension for tunnels / MPLS - question about user-space flow-cache

2015-04-03 Thread Jesse Gross
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Neil McKee wrote: > I've been looking at filling in the sFlow structures to report on tunnel > encap and other transformations. sFlow sampling is best done on ingress > only, so I can't use the egress-sampling action that the IPFIX > implementation uses to get t

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] acinclude: Always assume buggy strtok_r() for glibc < 2.8.

2015-04-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
Lately our internal build system has been seeing intermittent failures that I can't explain. With old glibc versions, the "configure" time check will pass, but the equivalent (almost identical) "make check" test will fail. One possibility, I guess, is that occasionally address space randomization

Re: [ovs-dev] question about availability of Centos 7.1 kernel support

2015-04-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:46:45PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > OVS userspace can work with the OVS kernel module distributed with the > kernel. This provides a straightforward workaround. > > I don't understand the comment about updating the FAQ/NEWS version > matrix. It already states that 2.3 s

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-sandbox: Tell gdb to start the daemon.

2015-04-03 Thread Russell Bryant
The current gdb support launches gdb but doesn't start the daemon. If you start ovsdb-server with gdb, ovs-sandbox produces an error as it tries to run ovs-vsctl before ovsdb-server is running. Telling gdb to start the daemon immediately avoids this error. There are cases where it's useful to go

Re: [ovs-dev] question about availability of Centos 7.1 kernel support

2015-04-03 Thread Joe Stringer
OVS userspace can work with the OVS kernel module distributed with the kernel. This provides a straightforward workaround. I don't understand the comment about updating the FAQ/NEWS version matrix. It already states that 2.3 supports Linux 2.6.32 to 3.14, and explicitly mentions that modified kern

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] stuck with 16-bit ifr_flags in FreeBSD

2015-04-03 Thread Ed Maste
On 3 April 2015 at 13:46, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> > Also, the commit you name was in 2013, and we've had other >> > contributions from FreeBSD contributors since then >> > (namely Ed Maste ) and it seems like he >> > would have noticed if it were totally busted. >> >> You mean this message: >> http:

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] stuck with 16-bit ifr_flags in FreeBSD

2015-04-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 12:10:30AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:16:18AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:02:16PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: > > > I'm attempting to install ovs 2.3.1 on FreeBSD and it appears to be broken > > > after the commit 666afb55e

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] stuck with 16-bit ifr_flags in FreeBSD

2015-04-03 Thread Kevin Lo
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:16:18AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:02:16PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: > > I'm attempting to install ovs 2.3.1 on FreeBSD and it appears to be broken > > after the commit 666afb55e84e9118812de81a75655ec9567b7a5b. > > Since FreeBSD uses two short in

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] datapath-windows: Solved BSOD when uninstalling the driver (race condition)

2015-04-03 Thread Sorin Vinturis
The BSOD occurred because the FilterAttach routine released the switch context, while there were IRPs in processing. The solution was to add a reference count to prevent premature deallocation of the global switch context structure, gOvsSwitchContext. Signed-off-by: Sorin Vinturis Reported-by:

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] stuck with 16-bit ifr_flags in FreeBSD

2015-04-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:02:16PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: > I'm attempting to install ovs 2.3.1 on FreeBSD and it appears to be broken > after the commit 666afb55e84e9118812de81a75655ec9567b7a5b. > Since FreeBSD uses two short integers to represent interface flags, > we have to apply mask 0x t

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] stuck with 16-bit ifr_flags in FreeBSD

2015-04-03 Thread Kevin Lo
Hi, I'm attempting to install ovs 2.3.1 on FreeBSD and it appears to be broken after the commit 666afb55e84e9118812de81a75655ec9567b7a5b. Since FreeBSD uses two short integers to represent interface flags, we have to apply mask 0x to flags. Signed-off-by: Kevin Lo --- diff --git a/lib/netd

Re: [ovs-dev] Online UK Drug Store, Big Discounts

2015-04-03 Thread Zachary
America's best doctors have met to decide the problems of male impotence! Are you satisfied with your penis size and thickness? If not it's time to change it! http://x.co/8JGnh ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/li

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: Solved BSOD when uninstalling the driver (race condition)

2015-04-03 Thread Sorin Vinturis
Eitan, I see what you mean. You are right. I will provide a v2 patch to address your point. Thanks, Sorin -Original Message- From: Eitan Eliahu [mailto:elia...@vmware.com] Sent: Friday, 3 April, 2015 02:11 To: Sorin Vinturis; dev@openvswitch.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] datapath-windows: S

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC] automake: fix rte_memcopy for gcc versions <=4.8.2

2015-04-03 Thread Kavanagh, Mark B
>On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:38:13PM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote: >> >> >On 04/01/15 at 07:45am, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote: >> >> >> >> >What's wrong with setting CFLAGS on the "configure" or "make" command >> >> >line? This is the standard way to do this with Automake and Autoconf. >> >> > >> >> >>