1) it's better to support connmark: save__mark & restore__mark, this
is very useful.
2) besides conntrack callback as an action, can we support other
netfilter chain hook callback(PREROUTING-raw, FORWARDING-filter...),
also as an action in the OVS flow table? This is not same as
linuxbridge iptabl
On 14 July 2014 13:05, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> > @@ -734,9 +722,25 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_fill_info(struct datapath
> *dp,
> > err = ovs_nla_put_flow(dp, &flow->key, &flow->mask->key, skb);
> > if (err)
> > goto error;
> > -
> > nla_nest_end(skb, nla);
>
On 10 July 2014 20:41, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 07/10/14 at 05:29pm, Joe Stringer wrote:
> > Split up ovs_flow_cmd_fill_info() to make it easier to cache parts of a
> > dump reply. This will be used to streamline flow_dump in the next patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer
>
> LGTM
>
> Acked-
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Split up ovs_flow_cmd_fill_info() to make it easier to cache parts of a
> dump reply. This will be used to streamline flow_dump in the next patch.
>
Nice refactoring.
> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer
> ---
> datapath/datapath.c | 87
> +
