Hi,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:38:58PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> if a queue length is long (ie. non-0), the consumer thread should
> already be busy working on the queue. there's no need to wake it
> up repeatedly.
...
> @@ -530,9 +532,13 @@ recv_upcalls(struct udpif *udpif)
> ovs
On 11/28/2013 08:24 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:51:20PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
On 11/26/2013 12:02 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 07:16:54PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
Based on the initial patch by Cong Wang posted a couple of months
ago.
This is the user s
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:51:20PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 12:02 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 07:16:54PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >>Based on the initial patch by Cong Wang posted a couple of months
> >>ago.
> >>
> >>This is the user space counterpart needed f
function reserve_sfa_size() uses ksize() (twice!)
to figure out whether it is possible to use some
extra space in the struct sf_flow_actions, or the
buffer should be reallocated.
Wouldn't it make more sense to rewrite the function
so that it uses krealloc() instead ?
There are very few places in
