On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:11:40PM -0600, Saul St. John wrote:
> This patch fixes regressions in the dist and distclean targets, and in
> the Debian build process, that were introduced by commit d2cb6c956b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saul St. John
Thanks. I updated the commit message by adding the firs
This patch fixes regressions in the dist and distclean targets, and in
the Debian build process, that were introduced by commit d2cb6c956b.
Signed-off-by: Saul St. John
---
debian/openvswitch-common.manpages |2 +-
utilities/bugtool/automake.mk |3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 09:55:06PM +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> The old algorithm tries to converge to 0, despite it would mean a very
> unbalanced situation. 1 is a more desirable goal. Fortunately rebalancing
> never
> worked, so this never caused a problem. But my previous patch needs it.
> It w
Bug #14357.
Reported-by: Luca Giraudo
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
This leak has been around forever. I expect to backport it all the
way to 1.4.
lib/rconn.c | 11 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/rconn.c b/lib/rconn.c
index 1ea022b..2049a90 1006
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:39:40PM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> >> +return di;
> >> +}
> >
> > In vswitch.ovsschema, I believe that we could limit obs_domain_id to the
> > 32-bit range, since it's a 32-bit value. Is it worthwhile to do so?
Thanks for the reviews, I'll do another round of unit tests and push
this.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:39:19PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > rconn_add_monitor() tries to check the version of the controller
> >
On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> +return di;
>> +}
>
> In vswitch.ovsschema, I believe that we could limit obs_domain_id to the
> 32-bit range, since it's a 32-bit value. Is it worthwhile to do so?
Good idea. I've done that, and done the changes you suggested for the other
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> rconn_add_monitor() tries to check the version of the controller
> connection being monitored, so that it can decide what OpenFlow version to
> tell the monitor connection to negotiate. But at any given time an rconn
>
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> All of the paths in open_vconn__(), except the one path that calls
> vconn_open() directly, just start the connection and do not block until
> it completes. This changes the remaining path to work the same way.
>
> Thi
Sir/Madam,
I am Mr.Aziz Tange a government and non governmental organization agent here in
Burkina Faso.
Presently, I have been authorized by the Ministry of works and housing to
negotiate for a contractor who can handle Project Zaca or supply the
construction materials for the project.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:52:11AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
...
> +struct dpif_ipfix *
> +dpif_ipfix_create(void)
> +{
> +struct dpif_ipfix *di;
> +di = xcalloc(1, sizeof *di);
You can use xzalloc(x) instead of xcalloc(1, x);
> +return di;
> +}
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:52:10AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
...
> +/* Compose SAMPLE action for sFlow or IPFIX. */
It would probably be better to document the usage of parameters here, at
the top of the function, rather than with the comment
> + /* Number
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:52:09AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> Define NXAST_SAMPLE_IPFIX OpenFlow vendor action and the corresponding
> OFPACT_SAMPLE_IPFIX OVS action.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
...
> +/* Action structure for NXAST_SAMPLE_IPFIX.
> + *
> + * Samples matching packets wi
Since Jesse is perpetually backlogged: if there are any parts of the
series that can be usefully applied without changing the datapath, let
me know, and I'll take care of it.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo
Thanks, applied to master.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:41:33PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> This has annoyed me for a while too. Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > The customary parameter order in Open vSwitch is to put input par
Thanks, applied to master.
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:07:54PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > We're really good about keeping manpages up to date, but terrible at
> > updating the dates at the bottom of the ma
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:54:46PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> > ---
> > FAQ |8
> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Looks good.
Thanks, applied to master.
Thanks, pushed to master.
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:08:31PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > I've always intended ovs-ofctl to work with any OpenFlow switch, not just
> > with Open vSwitch. This explicitly doc
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 01:47:32PM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:42:59AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Jarno Rajahalme
> > > >
>
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Dec 13, 2012, at 21:26 , ext Jesse Gross wrote:
>> Yes, at the kernel level there is no mapping from tunnel IP
>> information to either port or datapath - it just extracts the
>> information and stores it in the flow. This is why the s
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 04:22:24PM +, ?? wrote:
> 1. I want to run the ovs idl in a sperate thread, but the implementation
> traps some fatal signal to remove unix socket file which is not allowed in
> the thread that is no the main thread, does ovs idl python implementatin
> only aimed t
Hi list,
Recently I am researching on ovs python binding, and basically I want to
develop an app that operates and monitors ovsdb in python.
So I want to know what's the status of ovs python binding, I found there
does have an ovs idl implementation in the released source of ovs, and I
have tes
On Dec 13, 2012, at 21:26 , ext Jesse Gross wrote:
> Yes, at the kernel level there is no mapping from tunnel IP
> information to either port or datapath - it just extracts the
> information and stores it in the flow. This is why the single
> datapath changes were necessary.
>
What is the plan
23 matches
Mail list logo
