On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Jarno Rajahalme
wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> ---
> v3 restores compatibility with old userspace/kernel by
> unconditionally sending flags (as expected by old code),
> but making flags optional when received.
Applied, thank you very much (I made on
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:48:04PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> The datapath doesn't carry over tunnel metadata between input and
>> output because such an operation doesn't generally make sense. In
>> order to keep the flow information in sync
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:48:04PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> The datapath doesn't carry over tunnel metadata between input and
> output because such an operation doesn't generally make sense. In
> order to keep the flow information in sync, userspace needs to do
> this as well. However, userspa
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:48:03PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> When a packet is received on a tunnel the pad member is currently
> left uninitialized. This didn't previously cause problems because
> userspace didn't interprete the IPV4_TUNNEL attribute and blindly
> copied back the uninitialized d
When a packet is received on a tunnel the pad member is currently
left uninitialized. This didn't previously cause problems because
userspace didn't interprete the IPV4_TUNNEL attribute and blindly
copied back the uninitialized data. However, now that userspace
knows how to serialize this attribu
The datapath doesn't carry over tunnel metadata between input and
output because such an operation doesn't generally make sense. In
order to keep the flow information in sync, userspace needs to do
this as well. However, userspace was clearing out only the base
flow, which means that it later gen
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:14:57AM +1300, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Previously I misunderstood the way that the checksum works. I now
> understand that the constants are in host-byte order, and the result
> of the computation provides a checksum in the mirrored byte order.
> This means the calculation
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:15:06AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> [Adding ovs-dev]
> On Dec 31, 2012 9:19 AM, "APURVA PATIL" wrote:
>
> >
> > We want to establish communication between VMs on two different hosts. So,
> > we wanted to know whether it is possible using open-vSwitch. We tried to
> > setu
[Adding ovs-dev]
On Dec 31, 2012 9:19 AM, "APURVA PATIL" wrote:
>
> We want to establish communication between VMs on two different hosts. So,
> we wanted to know whether it is possible using open-vSwitch. We tried to
> setup on a normal PC connected to a LAN and the following problems arose :
>
Oh, also you said you tested it against OVS 1.4.2, but not against
1.4.3, which has an important relevant fix as commit 865f22b3b3cb9
(bond: Tag flows according to their hash bucket, not just their slave.).
It's always best to test against the latest version in whatever branch
you're using.
On Mon
The patch doesn't entirely add up. I've been intending to test the
behavior myself, but with the holidays and other stuff I have to do, I
haven't managed it yet.
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 03:48:12PM +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did you guys had any chance to check this patch? (and the one
>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 09:19:17PM +0530, APURVA PATIL wrote:
> We are trying to use open-vSwitch for communication between two
> VMs on different hosts, but getting some problems. So, needed help
> regarding the Internet connectivity on both Guest and the Host.
What problems do you see?
Hello All ,
We are trying to use open-vSwitch for communication between two
VMs on different hosts, but getting some problems. So, needed help
regarding the Internet connectivity on both Guest and the Host.
--
Apurva Shirish Patil
B.Tech(I.T.)
CoEP
___
Hi,
Did you guys had any chance to check this patch? (and the one related in
the next mail)
Btw. the numbering in the subject is wrong, it should be [PATCH 1/2].
Zoli
On 20/12/12 21:39, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
As the description of this field states, it should link the hash entry
to the slave. Wi
Hi Dev,
Addoyaw887 has decorated a favorite Search Engine for you, with your name on it! Yup you got it correctly, check it out on Dev.SleekSearch.com and have fun!
Message: We have 16kg X 22 karat gold dust for sales.Interested buyers should contact us,We sell at a give away price per kilo. An
15 matches
Mail list logo
