[dev] Re: fixing postgresql sdbc connector

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:40:30PM +0430, Jan wrote: > The build instructions on > http://dba.openoffice.org/drivers/postgresql/index.html > seem totally outdated since they use cvs, not hg. Yeah, because that driver *is* in cvs, not in hg. Separate project etc, never merged into the official code

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:28:53PM +0200, rony wrote: > On 07.06.2011 14:07, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >> Insulting people does not change facts and reality either, but is quite > >> > > You don't? Aha. I see insults from you too. "You cripple XYZ&qu

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:52:41PM +0200, rony wrote: > If packages deviate from the reference packages (OOo or LO), they get > > crippled, like it or not. Nonsense. They just ha a bit other structure, the functionality is supposed to be there. Just install the one package you miss.

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote: > Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information > has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation > seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple LO)! :( There IS NOTHING CRIPPELD. Just

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +0200, rony wrote: >This is the story for the current Ubuntu 11.04, plain-vanilla >installation, after having gone further: > > * Ubuntu 11.04 does *not* install any of the Java classes in >"/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis-link/program/classe

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:00AM +0200, rony wrote: > "unoinfo java" and interestingly "unoil.jar" is missing! Did a "locate > unoil.jar" after an "updatedb", but it is not installed. So this is Obviously totally untrue. I don't think Ubuntu removed unoil.jar, that would break everything Java-is

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:56:35AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > rene@frodo:~$ find /usr/lib/libreoffice/ -name "unoinfo*" > /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo > rene@frodo:~$ less /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo > > in Debian, is that what you mean? Go

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:28:24PM +0200, rony wrote: > It is almost crazy, because quite a few projects rely on unoinfo > supplying the correct CLASSPATH definition for interacting with OOo/LO > (the sequence matters), which then simply won't work with the Ubuntu > distros. And where should this

Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 06:02:44AM -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > "EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port" makes it sound you did the port. > > Me, I didn't understand if EducOOo is the subject or object here... (And with > issuezilla being down, I couldn't check the link either.) Was it donate

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:37:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > +.IF "$(ARM_TARGET)" == "ARMV6" > > This is broken, too, afaics. > In configure you set ARM_TARGET to e.g. 6 (WITHOUT ARMV)

[dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > +.IF "$(ARM_TARGET)" == "ARMV6" This is broken, too, afaics. In configure you set ARM_TARGET to e.g. 6 (WITHOUT ARMV) but there you use it WITH ARMV..

[dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

Hi, On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > ARM_TARGET=7 Oh, and this: +# Default is armv7 mini. If you build +# for an older version (could be slow), +# please adapt to your needs + +.IF "$(ARM_TARGET)" == "ARMV6" +ARCH_FLAGS+=-march=a

Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 08:41:43AM +0100, eric b wrote: > Hi, > > For your information : > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017 "EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port" makes it sound you did the port. Wrong. Stop your propaganda, please. Now to the technical points: ARM_TAR

Re: [dev] ARM port

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:08:47PM +0100, eric b wrote: > Sorry, but I tend to disagree : can you please tell me the arm > version choosen by default in OOo source code ? I'm just working at Whatever default your compiler does. $ file /usr/lib/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 /usr/lib/ure/lib/libuno_sal.

Re: [dev] ARM port

Hi, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:38:15AM +0100, eric b wrote: > >OpenOffice.org is already ported to Linux ARM, oabi and eabi, le and > >be. > > > > Sure. But the current port is generic and needs some improvements at > several places anyway, plus, the current OpenOffice.org is unusable > on such m

Re: [dev] Segmentatiefout in OOo -3.2.1 (Dutch version)

On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 06:47:42PM +0200, Ben Engbers wrote: > I have used the insturcions from > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wik ... > to install van LibreOffice 3.3. beta. Great! This is not a libreoffice discussion list (unfortunately) > The relavan part of the output from 'strace ./so

Re: [dev] macro run error

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:11:53AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Strange. Which platform are you on, and where did you get OOo from? > (The "lr" in "deploymnetlr.uno.so" indicates a platform, but it is none > of the "standard" ones.) What might give a clue is to call Linux/ARM. Grüße/Reg

Re: [dev] Classpath management in Java UNO extensions

Hi, On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:56:50AM -0400, Benson Margulies wrote: > If our UNO extension depends on some additional JAR files, do we need > to manifest them somehow, or just pack them into the OXT? You can do either of them. Class-Path: works, too if you for whatever reason don't want to embe

Re: [dev] Missing vcl resource

On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:58:17AM +0200, Malte Timmermann wrote: > 3.2.1.4 sounds like ooo-build, not vanilla OOo, so please use the > ooo-build mailing list for such questions... He already got told, but as we already notice for other questions, he can't read and does not follow advice. That sa

Re: [dev] no module named uno error

Hi, On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:19:01PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: > First time, I've built Openoffice without --with-system-python, but > the result is same. You obviously didn't read completely. I said that ooo-build defaults to using sytstem-python so you *of course* get no internal python. That

Re: [dev] no module named uno error

On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:29:29AM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: > I tried to do it --with-system-python. But it is not included python > in program directory. Of course. --with-system-python is the switch to NOT include it. > So I tried to build python separately and I got this message. > > Buildi

Re: [dev] no module named uno error

Hi, On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 09/06/10 01:01, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> But a "vanilla" OpenOffice.org install doesn't do that. And the only >> way (unless you put all the .pys and the needed .so files into pythons >>

Re: [dev] no module named uno error

On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:44:00PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: > import uno, unohelper > Import Error: No module named uno. Jup. > After install package for Openoffice 3.2.1.4 on Ubuntu, I tried these > scripts on Ubuntru, I run it successfully. Because Ubuntus OOo puts uno.py etc. in the system p

Re: [dev] Print format changes for Linux

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Philipp Lohmann wrote: > the CUPS print system that is used on Linux and other Unix operating > systems is switching its file format from PostScript to PDF. As part of > this OpenOffice.org should switch its print output file format to PDF, > too. Thi

Re: [dev] Porting addon from Linux to Windows

On Thto) u, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:47:13AM +0430, Jan private wrote: > Microsoft Visual C. Does this mean that I must use MSVC to compile my > addon? That would be a BIG problem since I am using the GiNaC library > wh ich does not exist in a MSVC version and does not willingly compile > with it. I bel

Re: [dev] patch error

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:16:53AM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: > Thanks, > I tried to do again, but I still have some patch error as follows: [snip] > How can I fix this problem? Please let me know. No. Not unless you start reading and following the hints/solutions we give you. (No, you don't curren

Re: [dev] Re: building openoffice problem

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 03:19:32PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: > >> BTW, I wonder after bin/ooinstall, I see the files (li) is searched in > > > > That is weird, yes. > > Is there way to search *lr instead of lr while processing bin/ooinstall ? You just do a correct build. The OOo install does not

Re: [dev] Re: building openoffice problem

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 02:43:22PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: > >> Because this directory, /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/, has > >> same file name compared to > > There is some error. My directory is /usr/oo-311/basis3.1/program/ > includes (*lr) files So you already built 3.1.1 for ARM? >

Re: [dev] Re: building openoffice problem

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:53:48PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: > But, I wonder what is difference between > /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/libavmediali.so and above file. The one is the system-version of it (of OOo 3.1!) and for Intel, and what you compiled is 3.2.1 and arm. Obvious, no? > B

Re: [dev] change log of jpeg library 8b

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:31:54PM +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: > we're still using version 6b, this is the change log since that version, > maybe some expert want to recommend an update ? Actually I'd recommend *against* it. I don't see versioned symbols there, and thus mixing 8b and 6b will

Re: [dev] external module stax and java baseline

Hi, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: > I'm just wondering wether the external module stax is still needed at > all anymore, it seems only needed if using JDK 1.5 and lower and not > needed if using gcj. My suggestion is to raise Java baseline to 1.6 and > re

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:02:55PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0200, rony wrote: > > So there is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup > > somewhere. > > As we already found out in this thread. > It&#

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:19:43PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Please do not put an absolute path into plain OOo's jurt.jar Class-Path. It's for *Debians* OOo. The path won't change in Debian anyways (and if it did it would automaticatilly be adapted). I don't think there's a safe way

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0200, rony wrote: > So there is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup > somewhere. As we already found out in this thread. It's a problem in Debian and Ubuntu because we move the Java libs to a standardized path with symlinks and OOo canno

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:26:58AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > The static > > NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), &

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > This works in standard OOo installations, where the jpipe dynamic > library is found relative to jurt.jar within the URE installation either > in ../../lib (Unix) or ../bin (Windows). > > This fails if you either use a jur

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > The static > NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), > "jpipe"); in class com.sun.star.lib.connections.pip.PipeConnection > within jurt.jar effectively depends on finding a jpipe dynamic li

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:29:47PM +0200, rony wrote: > (Or do I have to go through Synaptic manager and check all sort of Eww, synaptic. > modules (with the risk that I am overlooking an important one, given > that the OOo related modules seem to be quite dispersed.) apt-get install openoffice.

Re: [dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?

Hi, On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an > installation script the command-line tool "unopkg" is used. When > starting OOo thereafter a warning comes up that an instance of OOo would > be runni

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Michael Stahl wrote. > so try adding "/usr/lib/ure/lib/" to CLASSPATH, see if that helps. Or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (no idea whether that helps for JNI "Linkage" but it can be tried, too) Grüße/Regards, René - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:42:22AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > i think i remember this error... it is caused by not finding some URE > dynamic libraries, like libjpipe.so. > the Java UNO bridge apparently uses native code via JNI for some things. Then that is a bug in the bridge or the extension

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:57:26PM +0200, rony wrote: [...] > Uninstalling the Ubuntu OOo and instead installing the genuine OOo, > downloaed from http://OpenOffice.org/download, installing it and running > the very same program works without an error! We (at least Debian, can't speak of Ubun

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

Hi, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote: > (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled > over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read Where exactly? (Ubuntu borrows my packages and breaks them at times, but what you experience coul

Re: [dev] Re: Building ooo

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 29/07/2010 17:46, Rick Kautick wrote: > > Hi all, I'm not sure if I have come to the right place, but here goes > > nothing. > > > > I recently decided that I wanted to get involved with open source > > development, and thought th

Re: [dev] Build order

Hi, On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:29:50PM -0700, Gregoire Gentil wrote: > Which script are you talking about? I can't find any script that answers > my question. Thanks in advance for any tip, EnvSet.sh Grüße/Regards, René - To u

Re: [dev] Re: "FASTBOOL macro" vs "bool" - decrease memory usage

Hi, On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:15:29PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > isn't bool ususally (or at least sometimes) 4 bytes in size? $ cat test.cxx #include int main() { printf("%d\n", sizeof(bool)); } $ g++ -o lala ./test.cxx $ ./lala 1 Grüße/Regards, René -

Re: [dev] Build error in helpcontent2 (Lucene)

Hi, On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:54:53PM +0200, Pavel Laštovička wrote: > citing from issue #103354: > > "During the massive parallel build of helpcontent2 the lucene indexer > generates index files which are renamed. This behavior breaks the MSP > pack process, were no files have to be removed."

Re: [dev] Build error in helpcontent2 (Lucene)

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 06:13:15PM +0200, Pavel Lastovicka wrote: > when doing a parallel build of 3.2.1 on Cygwin I hit the following error: > Checking cfs file _0.cfs: Not found > cfs file check failed, terminating... See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112339 for a similar

Re: [dev] Re: Build Open office 3.20 on window XP

Hi, On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:47:07AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 20/06/2010 14:25, Lê Việt Quang wrote: > > Dear sir , I try to build OOO320_m12 on window XP , but it fail , and take > > this error , what is it ? > > any reason why you want to build such an outdated milestone? Because he

Re: [dev] Password protect extension

On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:24:24PM +0200, Steffen Grund wrote: > I really do not see the scenario: I really don't see the need to produce TOFU ;) > - if the extension is installed in shared mode, you have to be admin to > remove the extension Jup. > - if the extension is installed in the user

Re: [dev] Password protect extension

Hi, On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:01:57PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Le 08.06.2010 11:47, Kai Sommerfeld a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > On 08.06.10 10:37, Christian Heise wrote: > >> Hi everybody, > >> > >> Is it possible to protect an extension in a way that disabling or > >> uninstallation

Re: [dev] Re: ant error while compiling on win7

Hi, On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:14:32PM +0800, xiaofen...@iscas.ac.cn wrote: > Are you replying to my question? No, I replied to Michael. > It seems that what you quoted isn't from mine. Please read: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:40:59PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:

Re: [dev] Re: ant error while compiling on win7

Hi, On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:40:59PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > > ant -version > Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in > /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/lib/tools.jar > Apache Ant version 1.7.1 compiled on March 5 2010 > > > JAVA_HOME='/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun' ant -version > Apache

Re: [dev] subsequenttests

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 03:47:00PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> svp not possible? The smoketest at least works with it. > > No idea what you mean. SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN="svp" aka. headless. As said, works for me for the smoketest in 3.2.x. Grüße/Regards, René --

Re: [dev] ant error while compiling on win7

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:17:24PM +0800, xiaofen...@iscas.ac.cn wrote: > The error is: > ... > checking for jakarta-ant... no > checking for ant... /cygdrive/c/ant/bin/ant > checking whether ant is >= 1.6.0... ./configure: line 28460: test: tools: > integer > expression expected Ar

Re: [dev] subsequenttests

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 01:25:26PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 05/31/10 11:55, Bernd Eilers wrote: >> what X Server do the subsequenttests use by the way xvfbd or xvnc or >> something else? > > subsequenttests and below sets up nothing. The started soffice > instances simply use whatev

Re: [dev] subsequenttests

Hi, On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:24:17AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > With CWS sb120 integrated in DEV300_m80, the framework and tests will > hopefully be reliable enough for actual use, see [...] > the bots (see the second link above), and there might still be sporadic > failures (see >

Re: Re: [dev] CMake module for finding OpenOffice.org SDK installation

[ please follow Netiquette and wrote proper lines with proper linebreaks ] Hi, On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:20:49PM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > Actually, no, I disagree. As it's just a data file, we can just include > > it in the SDK. > > Actually, this script is not "OOo side" integrat

Re: [dev] CMake module for finding OpenOffice.org SDK installation

Hi, On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:46:12PM +0200, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > Once you have created such a page it would make sense to reference it > from http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions_development Actually, no, I disagree. As it's just a data file, we can just include it in the S

Re: [dev] CMake module for finding OpenOffice.org SDK installation

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:59:56PM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > File is attached. License is BSD. Any fixes/addition are welcomed. No. ;) (And you better file an issue with the patch anyway) Grüße/Regards, René - To unsu

Re: [dev] New build system

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:54:24AM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > * much faster installation - up-to-date binaries are not updated As we (unfortunately) don't have "proper" make install (but run make_installer anyway, which has already some sort of caching of the installset created) this point

Re: [dev] New build system

Hi, On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:07:04PM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > Also, with autotools you'll depend on their version. With CMake, you'll > set version number, and newer CMake versions will run in compatibility > mode with that version. You're off-topic, noone here said anything about fu

Re: [dev] Re: [releases] recommended stlport settings?

Hi, On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:43:28AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the > > STLport-requirement > > (and become URE-incompatible on the affected plat

[dev] Re: [releases] recommended stlport settings?

[ releases is not the correct list for that, X-posting to dev@ ] Hi, On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 04:24:51PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: > So far i686 needed --with-stlport to be able to use 3rd party > extensions. > > DEV300_m77 introduced cppunit requirement and now i686 configure fails: Not real

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:25:12PM +0200, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:52:11 +0200 > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > How is patch -pX lack of resources? How is telling people how they > > need to change stuff to get

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:30:12PM +0200, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:52:18 +0200 > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > a stronger community means actively involving hughe parts of the > > "community". which yo

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:30:12PM +0200, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:52:18 +0200 > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > a stronger community means actively involving hughe parts of the > > "community". whic

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:32:56PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: >>> mmh, i have still one problem. One motivation for me to go into the >>> CC was and still is that i will try to work for a stronger >>> OpenOffice.org community and against derivated work. And in >>> consequence of this i see

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:36:16AM +0200, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > mmh, i have still one problem. One motivation for me to go into the CC > was and still is that i will try to work for a stronger OpenOffice.org > community and against derivated work. And in consequence of this i see a

Re: [dev] problem with compiling ooo-build

Hi, On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 06:48:26PM +0200, Heiko L. wrote: > > |diff --git a/sc/inc/sc.hrc b/sc/inc/sc.hrc > > - pwd != patchdir > -> use -p1 Nonsense. If you looked at the actual patch: --- sc/inc/sc.hrc +++ sc/inc/sc.hrc Go figure. (The sbuild tree of theones who tries building is just f

Re: [dev] Using JUnit 4 in OOo build environment

Hi, On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:57:24PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > 1 Include JUnit 4 as an external module in the OOo code base, allowing > some configure --with-system-junit switch to override it. We could > include either Good. > 1.1 >

Re: [dev] new dependency to ant version 1.7.1

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:29:15AM +0100, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > i would like to increase the ant dependency to version 1.7.1. The reason > is that newer NetBeans versions create build.xml scripts that make use > of features from ant 1.7.1 Then they should be fixed not to use them. > It sho

Re: [dev] Re: where is the openoffice binary located

Hi, On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:05:54AM -0600, Wei Zhang wrote: > I was just wondering if the binary needs to be extracted from the tar.gz , > as mentioned in > ttp://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=26512 > , then w

Re: [dev] OO SDK GLIBCXX_3.4.9 not found in Linux Ubuntu

Hi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:33:08AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> r...@catullus:~# /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk/bin/uno-skeletonmaker >> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk/bin/uno-skeletonmaker: >> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk/bin/../../ure-link/lib/libstdc+

Re: [dev] Re: Build error

Hi, On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 03:08:09PM +0100, Björn Michaelsen wrote: > Am Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:39:51 +0100 > schrieb Rene Engelhard : > > > No, we should fix the build to *NOT* require it if you don't need it. > > Actually, there is a lot of work going on

Re: [dev] Re: Build error

Hi, On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 02:26:08PM +0100, Björn Michaelsen wrote: > so simple now with mercurial), but there is a also "testautomation" > tarball, maybe you need to add that one? If that is the case, we should > indeed update the docs to reflect that. No, we should fix the build to *NOT* requ

Re: [dev] disabling module xmlsecurity when not building module nss

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:17:05PM +0100, Joachim Lingner - Sun Germany Software Engineer - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: > As a consequence I will disable building of xmlsecurity when building of > the nss module is disabled. Please do not forget system-nss (aka system-mozilla) and that this of cours

Re: [dev] Build with Ubuntu 9.10

Hi, On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:24:55AM +0800, Zhu Lihua wrote: > In file mkdepend/def.h:157 > char *getline(); > > But in file /usr/include/stdio.h:651 > extern _IO_ssize_t getline (char **__restrict __lineptr, > size_t *__restrict __n, > F

Re: [dev] Library requirements (freetype2 >= 2.0 ) not met . . .

Hi, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:32:11AM -0500, Albretch Mueller wrote: > Thank you and I think error messages should be a bit more explicit. They are explicit enough. It's common that you need -dev for the libs. > r...@knoppix:/media/hdb2/inst/sw/OO/source/ooxpkgs# dpkg -l | grep curl > ii curl

Re: [dev] Recompiling OOo 3.1.1 Ubuntu (karmic) package source

Hi, On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:42:45PM +0800, Spider Larkin wrote: > If I try to skip the cleaning and unpacking: > $ rm debian/stampdir/build That just removes the debian stampfile. ooo-build has one, too. > $ debuild -uc -us -b -Tbuild > ...debuild sets up its environment... > ...cds into ooo-

Re: [dev] Security

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:10:29AM +0800, Wei Min Teo wrote: > Are there any known security flaws in the latest openoffice version that has > been disclosed? EPARSE. When it's disclosed it's on that page. [1] *Of course* not yet disclosed issues are not there. That's the point of "coordinated d

Re: [dev] Planned outage: EIS not available on 2009-10-23 07:30h - 08:00h MEST

Hi, On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 04:18:29PM +0200, Frank Mau wrote: > we scheduled an outage for half an hour for the external EIS > > Friday, 23th October, 07:30 a.m. - 08:00 a.m. MEST (means UTC +2) > > No updates will be recognized during the outage so please stay tuned for > further updates, than

Re: [dev] Where to download libagg source code package?

Hi, On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:23:14AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Thursday 08 October 2009, 23:30:22, Peng Yu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I know that openoffice website provide the source of agg. But where I > > can download its official source code release. > > Anti-grain geometry has

Re: [dev] Dropping tcsh support for Mac (all?) / changing configure's default

Hi, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:01:34PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 09/25/09 13:49, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> But what about defaulting to the current login shell? >> People who might want tcsh already might use it as login shell > > I would vote for getting rid of tcsh

Re: [dev] Dropping tcsh support for Mac (all?) / changing configure's default

Hi, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:42:25PM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > because of 105003, own bad experience with tcsh (random build freezes, > slow performance), encouraged by the kick4nt cws I'd like to go on and > drop tcsh support at least for Mac OS X. > > dropping tcsh support means: cha

Re: [dev] hsqldb patch (cws dba32h) for OOo 3.2

Hi, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:16:45AM +0200, Ocke Janssen wrote: > in cws dba32h a patch for hsqldb will be applied. For those using a > system hsqldb on their build environment please apply the patch as well. Then you probably should give us t he patch without requiring us to dig in a cws diff.

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:36:37PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > command - where's the "no net access from here onwards"-line drawn? > > After the download of the sources. When the actual build begins, there > is no net access allowed. And what it downlo

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:50PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > > BTW, if the problem only is that header (build still running), > > no, there are much more of those. No. (At least on Linux) cws boost134 build with system-boost *1.34* only needs that header #in

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:11:53PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > > After the download of the sources. > > Then let's define "download the pre-requisites" as a sub task of > "download the sources" :) Doesn't work. I need to upload a self-contained thing. THAT get

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:18:28PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > > For example, for Debian requiring any form of > > net access on a build is a no-go (and for some libs we have to use the > > internal versions, and be it sometime, in emergency) > > What's the def

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: >> Or invent a nice solution that does auto-downloads, and switch a few >> other huge external libs to that (like icu). ;) That would be a problem for some builders unless you don't download it when the file is there... For

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 03:12:11PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > > So we either need something like this (when did they change that?): > > [configure patch] > > I'd prefer that. Making the source code dependent on different boost > versions (even if it's only ab

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:31:59AM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > Hi Rene, > > The code as-is now will fail to build/work with system-boost < 1.39, > > I assume? > > Most probably. Didn't explicitly try that, though. OK, just tried, it fails e.g. in connectivity

Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > The new Math libraries 'Special Functions' and 'Statistical > Distribution' are not included in Boost 1.34, but first in Boost 1.35. > The accuracy of those functions is ongoing work in Calc and doing it > ourself has bee

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Frank Schoenheit - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: > > [ Seems so, do you now strictly need 1.39? > > No, I think 1.34 would do, too. As said, a previous incarnation of the > CWS compiles fine with 1.34, but again, I didn't do extensive runtime

[dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

[ dropping tinder...@tools, as they don't use system-boost anyway ] Hi, On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:56:34PM +0200, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > We invite everybody porting OOo to another platform to give feedback to > this project. As rumor has it, boost 1.39 creates proble

Re: [dev] libxml2 dependency on zlib

Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:26:44PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 07/20/09 12:46, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> The easiest fix is just to use system-zlib. At least for UNX. >> Any (UNIX) system will jave it > > No, the easiest fix still appears to just drop zlib support

Re: [dev] Mercurial Pilot Feedback, Results

Thorsten Ziehm wrote: > > Not difficult if you ignore problems ;-( > > I don't think, that Heiner ignore problem reports. He was very open > for comments for this pilot and did a lot to evaluate problems. As you > can read he has listed positive and also negative feedback. Also your > feedback is

Re: [dev] Mercurial Pilot Feedback, Results

[ forgot something ] Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: > intensive due to the implementation in python. Also there was > a misunderstanding about when hg uses hard links as an > optimization. There wasn't actually, I just followed your pilot documentation 1:1. If that sucked you can't b

Re: [dev] Mercurial Pilot Feedback, Results

Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: > Scalability: > > - overall perceived good performance, some were even quite enthusiastic >about it (SVN users are easy to please ...). > - there were three mentions of sub-par performance which all >have been investigated shortly: >- unexpected

  1   2   3   >