On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:21 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> if you open "Styles and Formatting", eg with the toolbar icon left to
> the Font selection box in the OpenOffice toolbars you will see a
> "watering can" icon in the dialog. The SID_STYLE_WATERCAN slot ID is
> most likely as
big deal
but not knowing the answer for it is killing me.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 09:29 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Either that, or I'm searching for it in the wrong place.
Nevermind - it was on the side bar under Change-Mails, as Thorsten told
me. Now, if only I could figure out how to fill this thing...
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 07:50 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 13:25 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> > Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > > Hi Bernd,
> >
> > Hi Kohei,
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:13 +0200, Bernd Eiler
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 13:25 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Hi Bernd,
>
> Hi Kohei,
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:13 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> >> The form in EIS to enter a featuremail
> >
> > BTW, I can't
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:13 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> The form in EIS to enter a featuremail
BTW, I can't add feature mail in the EIS. I don't have any button to
enter or edit feature mails anywhere. Is this a permission issue,
or ... ?
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - O
and
acorrcfg.hxx are also affected, quite possibly others too.
The good news is that this does not break anything thanks to those
header guards, but I guess we should still fix this...
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org En
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 18:21 +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> the pilot is just to make certain that there aren't any unexpected
> glitches in hg with respect to scalability or features. If everything is
> OK we will go with hg.
Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification.
Kohei
---
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 15:19 +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> time to start the OOo Mercurial pilot. Please find the details here:
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Mercurial_Pilot
Hi Heiner,
So, is the pilot being done to just make sure everything is okay with
hg, or is ther
ream those fixes in the core but I'll make that happen sooner
rather than later (probably during the 3.2 dev cycle). To date, there
are still issues with the core implementation which need to be fixed in
order to make this feature more stable.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engin
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 10:52 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> I'm now checking out the cws once again to do a fresh rebase, to see
> if
> that works.
And this worked! Still not sure what the problem was that prevented the
rebase in the first place.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffic
ip' files are flag files only. Just empty files. You cannot
> really make something wrong when updating them.
Unfortunately not. I've also tried Heiner's suggestion but that didn't
solve the problem either.
I'm now checking out the cws once again to do a fres
he funny
thing is, I've successfully rebased several other CWSes to m38 and this
is the first time I've got this problem.
Any known workaround on this? As Caolan already said, running 'svn up'
does not seem to fix it.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell
oaded my key through the EIS upload page.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e_ PKGFORMAT=installed
where should be substituted with your locale name.
Just guessing, since I've never installed OOo this way on locale other
than en-US.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etoo_native/util
dmake openoffice_en-US PKGFORMAT=installed
then launch OOo from that installed location for your development.
HTH,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
th you there. As you said, the default ctor not being called is often
an indication that the class as a whole is not used at all.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To
vailable on the callcatcher page.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 10:29 +0100, Caolan McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 17:54 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Hi Niklas,
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 19:17 +0200, Niklas Nebel wrote:
> > > example: CHINA001
> >
> > In the interest of removing
?
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is to put the default and copy ctors
in the private section of the class declaration, and leave their
definitions out. That should prevent the compiler from automatically
generating those ctors, and if any code constructs that class via
default or copy constructor, then the link should fail.
--
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 15:16 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Having said that, I would like to still reserve the right to just
> outright remove code if I think with strong certainty that the code
> shouldn't be there at all. ;-)
And again, if I removed something by mistake that you
trong certainty that the code
shouldn't be there at all. ;-)
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ess of implementation.
>
> Perhaps #ifdef FUTURE around it, or else I can add such things to the
> whitelist if that's undesirable.
For now, I'll put '#define MAYBE_REMOVE_THIS 0' in global.hxx and use it
for the codes I'm not sure about.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - O
ul about removing one of getter-setter pair. Let me
know if there is more that I've removed but you want to restore.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsu
let me tackle that.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r directory
> make: ** [install] Error 1
>
> Seams that are files that werent create and that are needed to build.
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That said, I don't track gcc's
development closely, so I may be wrong.
Have you guys tried to build Sesame using gcj by the way? I think it'd
be much quicker to just try and see.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:37 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> what are your opinions on making java 1.5 a requirement for OOo 3.0?
Heck no way!
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
so I would not see it as a big roadblock, as long as
someone else's doing the work. ;-)
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
cause of
any logistics but because Calc is not Excel. So, when in doubt,
defaulting to Excel's behavior makes sense to me.
Anyway, that's the way I see it. Agree or disagree, is up to you.
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engin
PE
ISA
PTR_CAST
So, we'd probably watch out for their usage when removing TYPEINFO
altogether.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
uld think it should be okay.
Besides, I don't think it's feasible to remove them all at once. We
should do it gradually in steps.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Hi Eike,
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 21:23 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, 2008-01-03 16:19:00 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
> >> #define __EXPORT
> >>
> >> Do we still need this one or we can stop using it?
>
> IMHO we can safely free our memories from that.
Cool! Then I will
Hi Stephan,
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 09:09 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> It was introduced and heavily used at a time when compiler-based RTTI
> was still unavailable or too expensive. It would not be necessary today
> that we have compiler-based RTTI available everywhere, but I guess that
>
aSameOrSuperType ) const
used all over the place. But is this macro still actively used or is it
deprecated?
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
m problem. Updating it to
1.5.25-7 fixed it.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
be modeled after Java's java.util.zip API from the look of it.
HTH.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 15:39 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> Kohei Yoshida wrote (9-11-2007 15:21)
> > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 08:54 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> >> Count for 2.3.0 is only (...) about 70.
> >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/New_Featur
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 13:41 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 16:47 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> >
> >> Anyhow you certainly don´t want to break that semi-automatic process to
> >> generate Release
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 13:25 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
>
> So well as long as the spec is not finished and not using the template
> it doesn´t appear correctly in the release notes interim document. But
> this currently only affects the release notes for the first developer
> milestone the fe
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 08:54 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Count for 2.3.0 is only (...) about 70.
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/New_Features_2.3#Full_list
>
> Though some structured data/lists were available, it took more that a
> day to only discover all features. Some simply had to be
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 16:47 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> Anyhow you certainly don´t want to break that semi-automatic process to
> generate Release Notes and volunteer to offer to parse a few hundred
> specifications in a few hundred different plain text based formats
So, is that true that we
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 16:47 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> Openoffice Development wrote:
> >
> >> A defined process !? By who? I thought we (Sun and non-Sun) agreed
> >> when we had that big spec process discussion back in 2006[1] that the
> >> format of the specification no longer matters, but t
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 12:14 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> This process will break if developers do not use the correct templates
> which is a defined process for creating new specifications.
A defined process !? By who? I thought we (Sun and non-Sun) agreed
when we had that big spec process di
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 10:12 +0300, Andrei Dascalu wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've been trying to find and isolate the formula parser and interpreter
> used by the Calc application. I've managed to identify the function
> definitions and symbol definitions but I can't seem to find where the
> actua
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 23:21 +0200, Johan Rudholm wrote:
> Does anyone have any good advice? I would very much like to type the
> equivalent of "make install". :)
/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/bin/userscripts/install
is your friend. :-)
Have fun!
Kohei
--
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 07:15 +0200, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems
Germa?ßISO-8859-1?Q?ny wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> > 1) The use of "product" and "non-product" terms seems unclear to me.
> > What do they mean exactly?
>
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Non_Product_Build
Excellent. Tha
Hi Thorsten,
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 22:25 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Kohei Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 1) The use of "product" and "non-product" terms seems unclear to me.
> > What do they mean exactly?
> >
> Hi Kohei,
&g
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 22:22 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
> Mathias Bauer already pointed out that a operational build bot system is
> essential and solves the problems you mention here, we need to make this
> a priority
That sounds fantastic, thank you. :-)
Kohei
---
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 17:28 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
> Eike Rathke wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > On Wednesday, 2007-07-04 17:04:39 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
> >
> >
> >> modified version of the child workspace policies on
> >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/CWS_Policies
>
Hi Oliver,
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 10:07 +0200, Oliver Craemer - Sun Germany - ham02
- Hamburg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> good work, but I miss the point where it is mentioned that there must be
> a link to the installsets for the QA. This should not be a "nice to
> have" but a "must", otherwise the QA rep
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 13:15 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is the Jam stuff in the OOo source tree (thought as a replacement for
> dmake) still relevant or is it dead code (that should go)?
More importantly, what happened to our grand --enable-jam project? I
loved that concept & h
Hi Joe,
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 12:36 -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> Eike Rathke wrote:
> > The GNU libstdc++ code won't do anyway because it is GPL, not LGPL. ...
>
> IANAL--I don't even like to discuss licenses--but I thought as long as
> you simply _use_ a GPL library, you're not under the GPL.
T
Hi Mikael,
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 14:33 +0200, Mikael De Bie wrote:
>
> I've used your code of scsolver as base for my extension, have you a
> makefile that generate the dll files for your scsolver ? If so, can you
> please send it to me ?
Sorry. I don't have a good makefile for building dll fi
indows.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/20/06, Gurpreet Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I am facing an error when I am trying to run shell script from CUI mode.
It is displaying the error that "Cannot connect to X server".
OO.o requires X server to be running at run time. To run OO.o without
X server, you need to use som
On 12/21/06, Nikolai Pretzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is: From today on, we use internal include guards only.
...
What do you think?
Sounds good to me. :-)
Kohei
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
On 18 Dec 2006 11:46:35 +0100, Thorsten Behrens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd say let's add the rule then. I'm relatively indifferent about
this, though - if people think it's ok to start removing external
header guards right now (because it will take years to clean them up
anyway), I'd be fine
On 12/15/06, Christian Lohmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a rule wrt parenthesis? At the same line or on a seperate one?
Or is there no preference?
I don't think it's that important to specify parenthesis style as a
rule. It's a little too excessive, and a little too difficult to
st
On 12/12/06, Eike Rathke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2006-12-12 10:26:41 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> The first thing that caught my eye is that, you guys are switching
> from using tab characters for indentation to using spaces.
Actually that's n
Hi Thorsten,
On 12 Dec 2006 16:13:22 +0100, Thorsten Behrens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
...
Thanks for listening, and eagerly waiting for your feedback!
The first thing that caught my eye is that, you guys are switching
from using tab characters for indentation to using spaces. I'
On 11/14/06, Kai Backman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/14/06, Michael Meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I believe Kai volunteered to write some of this up in the Wiki
> somewhere as a conclusion, so we actually move to the "decision making"
> phase after the lengthy discussion ;-)
Ye
On 11/6/06, Niklas Nebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On 11/3/06, Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Let's put it that way: it should be possible to integrate something even
>> if the original goal laid out in the spec wasn&#
On 11/3/06, Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's put it that way: it should be possible to integrate something even
if the original goal laid out in the spec wasn't reached but the result
is "good enough". "Good enough" means that we could live with it even if
nothing was changed until
On 11/3/06, Niklas Nebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Another point I want to mention is that, perhaps the UI design
> requirement at CWS integration time should be relaxed a bit. Instead
> of requiring UE approveal of the UI change at cws integration time,
On 11/2/06, Michael Meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems there has been a wide-ranging debate on the spec. topic wrt.
reducing potentially discouraging barriers to entry for community
contributors. I tried to summarise where I -think- we're at, and then
present some principles & som
> So, the language used in the spec should be oriented toward QA
> personnel (i.e. less advertising or "selling" tone, but more
> technicality and correctness).
A spec is a strictly technical document. Advertisement and selling has
nothing to do with it.
Yes, that was my understanding as well.
Hi Cor,
On 11/2/06, Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe this whole discussion is influenced by the fact, that many in
FLOSS love freedom so much, that they become a little bit offended, when
they see some kind of format ;-) (of course no offence meant).
Nah. This thread has little to
Hi Michael,
All looks good to me. Some comments.
* (Perhaps) Controversial
+ The primary consumer of a finished spec. is QA
So, the language used in the spec should be oriented toward QA
personnel (i.e. less advertising or "selling" tone, but more
technicality and correctness).
Hi Mathias,
On 10/31/06, Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> 2) The target audience is not very clear. Thanks to this thread,
> though, now I'm beginning to see who the specification documents are
> intended for (mostly for QA, right?).
N
Hi Cor,
On 11/1/06, Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kohei,
I think it is party right what you write. Because I've some more
experience is writing words than code, I don't have that 'problem' and
maybe under estimate it.
I have no doubt that expressing and formulating ideas into wor
On 11/1/06, Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote:
> But we didn't write down a spec. We conceived of the idea, then
> implemented it, now we have it. The original conception of course was
> prolly inaccurate, no-one gets things right 1st time, we most likely
> have a so
On 10/31/06, Mikaël De Bie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida a écrit :
> Hi Mikaël,
>
> On 10/31/06, Mikaël De Bie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The add-in I want to compile is the scsolver created by Kohei Yoshida
>> (http://kohei.us
Hi Mikaël,
On 10/31/06, Mikaël De Bie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The add-in I want to compile is the scsolver created by Kohei Yoshida
(http://kohei.us/ooo/solver/)
I've downloaded the scsolver sources from
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/ooo-build/scratch/scsolver/
As I mentioned
Hi Nikolai,
On 10/30/06, Nikolai Pretzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
> On 10/27/06, Nikolai Pretzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
>
>> > In a not-so-ideal world, things don't always go as planned.
&
On 10/29/06, Mikaël De Bie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for you quick answer.
I got all the source files from :
$SRC_ROOT> cvs /
-d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs /
co -r SRC680 OpenOffice2
my SRC_ROOT is the directory /docs
that's the version that is recommended on the wiki (SRC
On 10/27/06, Nikolai Pretzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
> In a not-so-ideal world, things don't always go as planned.
> Requirements grow organically over the development life cycle of that
> feature, but the spec document may not always get update
Hi Cor,
On 10/25/06, Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David, *,
David Fraser wrote:
[...]
> 3) The spec process is apparently working well for those inside Sun,
> less well for those outside. If there were an easier route for those
> less involved in development to produce specs it coul
Hi David,
On 10/25/06, David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This involved developing the spec collaboratively in the wiki
Unfortunately the spec team did not like this idea and have gone for an
OOo template for designing specifications with
Did the spec team discuss with you the reason why
On 10/25/06, Nikolai Pretzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Ziehm schrieb:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> them: "We need this burdensome process for Higher Quality !"
>> us: "But lets face it quality is still not good"
>> them: "Then we need -even-more- burdensome process !
ail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Kohei Yoshida, OpenOffice.org Calc Hacker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ions.
http://api.openoffice.org/DevelopersGuide/DevelopersGuide.html
Since this guide is HUGE, I'd recommend you download the pdf version
http://api.openoffice.org/docs/DevelopersGuide/DevelopersGuide.pdf
For any API related questions, you can use dev@api.openoffice.org mainling list.
HTH,
Kohei
someone work
with the file format people to make the necessary change.
I was the last one who spoke on this issue, and since then there is no
real progress.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc Hacker
http://kohei.us/ooo/
--
> change (back).
This page will hopefully give you enough information, or at least be a
good starting point.
http://tools.openoffice.org/
HTH,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc Hacker
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscri
Hi Jacqueline,
My reply is very long, so be warned. :-)
On 11/25/05, Jacqueline McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kohei Yoshida wrote:
...
> > When I first start messing around with the code a few years ago, of
> > course it was a lot harder than it is today to find the
project. But I think I can
count myself as one today (I hope).
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s it crash the applicaton.
It's just a simple annoyance. I'm sure it is high priority for you,
but when there are literally thousands of bugs to get squashed, a
method must be developed to properly prioritize them.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us
On 11/8/05, Kohei Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/8/05, John Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >And why
> > has such a basic problem remained unfixed since April?.
>
> Because no one has bothered to file an issue for it? Seriously
o do his/her part, before coming to a dev list and demand *someone
else* fix it for *you*.
BTW, this would be a great opportunity to get your hands down and
dirty with the code. Trying to fix a bug that bothers you a lot is a
great way t
Hi Mathias,
On 11/3/05, Kohei Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/3/05, Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can add a subfolder to the documents' package and (important!) add a
> > MediaType to it (details can follow if you like this way). Then
On 11/3/05, Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > 1) Put the values into some type of a XML structure, and inject it
> > into the zipped file structure (if that's even possible).
>
> You can add a subfolder to the documents' packa
a macro to
locally suppress the warning within hdl headers. Because of the
severity of overlooking this warning, turning it off globally would be
IMO a very bad move.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
Thanks,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for 'extension', but I'd rather have 'extension' than
any of the above. ;-)
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/26/05, Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - addon.openoffice.org (already 1 vote)
+1
I vote for addon. Of all three choices it sounds most reasonable to me.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://koh
mendously helpful. If these helper classes got
exported the same way those in the rtl namespace are, it would boost
more C++ UNO component developments.
I can't help but feel as though the UNO C++ binding is left behind the
other l
Sorry, somehow Gmail thought I was ready to send it when I wasn't... Hmm.. :(
On 9/11/05, Kohei Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> In a nutshell, you need to compile your component into a dll for
> Windows, and .so's for unixes, and put them as follows:
>
> m
it from your system
> immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or using any of the
> contact details noted herein.
>
> This e-mail sent via Evolution 2.2.1 running on a Linux 2.6.12 kernel.
>
>
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t would be the right list to bring the
discussion to.
Regards,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
