Sidebar extension

Hello I am using java to builld sidebar extension I have successfully creat my panel And now I am trying to add item list and a drop down list in to the panel but I have no idea how to do it So please if you can help me out wher to start or give me a sample

Re: OpenOffice.org migration status

Hi Dave, On 10/27/20 11:32 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi - The new repository is https://GitHub.com/Apache/OpenOffice-org The next steps are to finish the templates. (Wednesday) (1) Breadcrumbs (2) Branding/Navigation adjustments per directory (Thursday) (3) Staging / Test server with Infra help

Re: QA Automated Test coverage

Hi Damjan, On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:14 PM Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, I've been testing builds with the automated BVT and FVT tests lately. I have a few questions: 1. Is there anything documented about how much coverage these tests provide vs.fu

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone share which one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there any particular file(s) I should use to test? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@o

git bisect

I must say: I am pretty glad we made the switch to git; the speed at which I was able to switch to various hashes, the usefulness of 'bisect' (which is built in) and the seamlessness of being able to work on checkouts and then just trash my local updates, all made the testing process a lot smoot

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Hi Jim, On 10/28/20 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone share which one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there any particular file(s) I should use to test? --

Re: Google Analytics and Download Count

Am 28.10.20 um 00:32 schrieb Dave Fisher: What git migration? Exactly. I did only switch, without taking everyone along. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:51 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:  Am 27.10.20 um 23:22 schrieb Dave Fisher: Hi - Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:0

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Hi Jim Top posting. The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing that version. If this is just a test VM, I would say it could be useful if you installed 20.04.1 LTS which none of us is using but earl

Re: Sidebar extension

Hello, Extensions are not part of OpenOffice core. If you develop it, the best way is to go on forum for help: https://forum.openoffice.org You can find some resource on wiki too: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Sidebar_for_Developers - Mail original - > De: "Maram Abbas" > À: dev@open

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Can someone send me a file or 2 that is known to cause the error? TIA > On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Pedro Lino > wrote: > > Hi Jim > > Top posting. > The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still > supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Hi Jim Find attached an odt and an ods that I just confirmed that cause the error messages with test12 Regards, Pedro (the attachments will not be available to the mailing list) > On 10/28/2020 3:02 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Can someone send me a file or 2 that is known to cause the

building from a source tarball

Something that we are still missing for AOO418 is a fix for getting the revision info when building from a source tarball instead of a git checkout. Someone mentioned this a couple weeks ago. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

Re: building from a source tarball

Hi Don, This should be working since last year? https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/0c6d6194a959cb1b87417e9077dc1d8ece630b11 Regards,    Matthias Am 28.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Don Lewis: > Something that we are still missing for AOO418 is a fix for getting the > revision info when buil

Re: building from a source tarball

On 28 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > This should be working since last year? > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/0c6d6194a959cb1b87417e9077dc1d8ece630b11 Item #2 here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r228db9ac55fc89c7286943f31cfd862d944c45264cdd6f662dc2a8f9%40%3Cde

Re: building from a source tarball

Yes, I know, but that was not confirmed by anyone. I would have thought that it was tested in more than a year? Regards,    Matthias Am 28.10.20 um 19:06 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 28 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> This should be working since last year? >> >> https://github.com/apac

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Thanks... in the meantime, please test the '-jj1' builds available. > On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Jim > > Find attached an odt and an ods that I just confirmed that cause the error > messages with test12 > > Regards, > Pedro > > (the attachments will not be availabl

Re: building from a source tarball

I cannot recreate this... > On Oct 28, 2020, at 2:06 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 28 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> This should be working since last year? >> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/0c6d6194a959cb1b87417e9077dc1d8ece630b11 >> >>

Re: building from a source tarball

In particular, this is when building from the "official" SRC_RELEASE tarball we provide. Is the inc/reporevision.lst file not included? > On Oct 28, 2020, at 2:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I cannot recreate this... > >> On Oct 28, 2020, at 2:06 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> On 28 Oct, Matthi

Re: building from a source tarball

On 28 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: > In particular, this is when building from the "official" SRC_RELEASE > tarball we provide. Is the inc/reporevision.lst file not included? It is in one of the RCs that I looked at. - To unsubscri

Re: OpenOffice.org migration status

Breadcrumbs are completed. Templates are refactored to be: (1) brand.gsp to render the branding and search top part of pages. Input is metadata in an md file. type=brand search=search selectedlang=en language=Language name=Apache OpenOffice tagline=The Free and Open Productivity Suite log

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Hi Jim, "General Error" when opening files on Ubuntu 16.04. Am 28.10.20 um 19:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Thanks... in the meantime, please test the '-jj1' builds available. > >> On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: >> >> Hi Jim >> >> Find attached an odt and an ods that I just confirm

Re: building from a source tarball

Don Lewis wrote: On 28 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: In particular, this is when building from the "official" SRC_RELEASE tarball we provide. Is the inc/reporevision.lst file not included? It is in one of the RCs that I looked at. I don't have full information, but as I was the one who reported

Re: Test to Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.8_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US-v2

Test with AOO_4.1.8_testjj1 In Debian 10: error messages at saving first time and when I open a odt document :-( Regards, Delio. - Mensaje original - De: "Delio Orozco Gonzalez" Para: "dev" Enviados: Martes, 27 de Octubre 2020 20:07:40 Asunto: Re: Test to Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.8_Linu

Re: QA Automated Test coverage

Peter Kovacs wrote: Maybe the following link helps? https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html Indeed, this section https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/ seems to contain at least some of the recent (2012) testcases. So one could use this as a basis if we want to restart

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Top posting: Confirmed under Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 > On 10/28/2020 8:10 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > Hi Jim, > > "General Error" when opening files on Ubuntu 16.04. > > Am 28.10.20 um 19:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > > Thanks... in the meantime, please test the '-jj1' builds available. > > > >

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch, >> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure >> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new >> stuff that the RDF s

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Hi Jim, On 10/28/20 2:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Thanks... in the meantime, please test the '-jj1' builds available. General Errors on opening using Ubuntu 18.04 VM. Best regards, Carl On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: Hi Jim Find attached an odt and an ods that I just co

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch, >>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure >>> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction