On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
>>> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new
>>> stuff that the RDF stuff does. The problem is with the patch or how it
>>> is working...
>> 
>> I'm thinking of any configure scripts used by raptor / rasqal / redland,
>> which would have changed by the upgrade.
> 
> I took a look at the configure outputs for those three.  I did see some
> significant differences for redland.  In particular, on CentOS 5,
> redland was picking up a system version of curl.  I think I installed a
> newer version of curl, liked with a modern verson of openssl so a newer
> version of git would work with github.  Thinking that librdf might have
> been linked to the system libcurl, I uninstalled curl on the CentOS5 box
> and did a another rebuild.  I still saw breakage when I installed the
> packages on Ubuntu 16.
> 
> Digging in some more, I ran ldd on the librdf.so that we build and
> discovered that libgcrypt was not being found.  On CentOS 5, libgcrypt
> is version 11.5.2 and on Ubuntu 16 it is 20.0.5.  That's a problem.  I
> wonder if redland actually needs libgcrypt for our purposes.

libraptor2 wants to link to the system icu libraries.  I haven't quite
figured out why raptor2 wants to use icu and the older raptor library
does not seem to need it.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to